Can we calculate the optical illusion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter janakiraman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of calculating optical illusions, specifically regarding how the orientation of objects, like a car park barrier, affects perceived length. Participants debate whether the differences in perception are due to optical principles or neurological interpretations of visual information. Some argue that certain phenomena, such as temperature inversions, are not true optical illusions but rather effects of light scattering. The conversation highlights the complexity of defining and understanding optical illusions, blending both psychological and physical aspects. Ultimately, the thread raises questions about the nature of perception and the principles of optics in relation to visual illusions.
janakiraman
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi I was just wondering if it is possible to calculate the optical illusion. For example consider a barrier for the car park. It looks very long when it is vertical and upright but very small when it is horizontal. The illusion that we obtain when the barrier is vertical will make us assume that if the barrier is horizontal to be much longer than the actual length. now my question is, is it possible to calculate the difference between the illusion length and the actual length by the principle of optics? If so how
 
Science news on Phys.org
I have no idea what "optical illusion" you are talking about. I don't know why you think being "horizontal" or "vertical" would affect how large something looks. Are you possibly talking about the difference between look down the length of an object as opposed to looking at it at a right angle to its length?
 
Optical illusions are primarily mental effects. There was a neurological paper published a few months ago about how the brain is constantly extrapolating what you see into the future, and they speculated that illusions were a result of the extrapolation gone awry.
 
But there are also optical illusions that can be recorded on camera, not brain constructs, such as those caused by temperature inversions in deserts...of horizon distortions on water where trees appear to "float"...

Likely these are caused by light scattering in different ways from different density air and hence displaced from their "normal" locations...
 
@ HallsofIvy

No the illusion I'm talking about is when you see an object like a carpark barrier upright the mind always extrapolates its length and if we are ask to calculate the distance mentally how much it would be in horizontally we always end up calculating more than the actual distance when it is horizontal. I just wanted to know if by principle of optics we can calculate this illusionary extra distance that our brain calculates.
 
@ Naty1

That' s very close what i had tried to frame. Maybe a better way to ask is what causes such illusions in a camera? And by the way your answer was very abstract. Can you please explain in detail about the same
 
Naty1 said:
But there are also optical illusions that can be recorded on camera, not brain constructs, such as those caused by temperature inversions in deserts...of horizon distortions on water where trees appear to "float"...

Likely these are caused by light scattering in different ways from different density air and hence displaced from their "normal" locations...

But are these REALLY considered as optical illusion? They are not illusion because they are due to basic optics.

I tend to think that optical illusion is more of what Manchot has described, which makes the topic of this thread very puzzling.

Zz.
 
Back
Top