Can We Create Winged Kids Safely?

  • Thread starter Thread starter megamind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kids
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of genetically engineering humans to have wings, inspired by the Maximum Ride series. It highlights that advanced genetic engineering could theoretically allow for such modifications, but significant physiological challenges would arise. Adding wings would necessitate changes in body structure and function, including increased metabolic demands, heart capacity, and skeletal strength. The complexities of human development indicate that DNA modifications would need to occur at the fertilized egg stage, as post-birth alterations would be ineffective. The analogy of DNA as baking instructions emphasizes that simply inserting a "wing gene" into the human genome is insufficient without a complete understanding of the necessary biological systems. Overall, while the concept is intriguing, the practical implications and potential negative effects make it highly unlikely to achieve without significant consequences.
megamind
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've read the Maximum Ride series(great series, by the way). In the series, these kids are taken from there mothers at birth, are taken to a laboratory, and are crossed with bird DNA to give them wings. Do you think it would be possible in real life to produce winged kids, without giving them traits that could be harmful or unwanted such as weird diets or features?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With sufficiently advanced genetic engineering technology and knowledge, sure.
 
Think about it. Would extra mass require more brain (for control)?, more liver function? kidney? gut? stomach? stronger legs? stronger spine? You don't weld wings on a car and then take off into the wild blue yonder. ANy additional metabolic demand will have to be met. You will need extra energy (so have to eat more), you will need more blood (so your heart will work harder). Its a safe bet that our design is a compromise and while may be somewhere close to an optimum (for a diverse set of environments and needs) it is unlikely that we could make a major change to our physiology without all sorts of harmful effects. The argument is similar to the one about mutations. There are three possible types of single point mutation: neutral, negative, and positive. The chances of a mutation being positive is probably a million times smaller than it being negative. How many birds our size do you know of?
 
Well, certain flying animals got more massive than humans. However, I don't think a human capable of flight in 1 gee would look much like a human anymore. The structural requirements of flight are extreme, to put it mildly.
 
megamind said:
I've read the Maximum Ride series(great series, by the way). In the series, these kids are taken from there mothers at birth, are taken to a laboratory, and are crossed with bird DNA to give them wings. Do you think it would be possible in real life to produce winged kids, without giving them traits that could be harmful or unwanted such as weird diets or features?

Your DNA affects the structure of your body while you are developing before birth. So after you are born, it is too late to make the kind of body changes you are talking about (adding wings). You would need to modify the DNA at the fertilized egg stage before the body started developing.
 
Is it possible? Sure, though as abitslow said, anything that flies in a 1 g, 100 kPa environment isn't going to look anything like a human being.

The thing is, saying that it's possible that such a thing could happen when there's no hard "due date" save the heat death of the universe isn't the same thing as saying we could do it.

DNA isn't so much like blueprints as it is like baking instructions, you see: if you take the "set oven to 300 degrees Fahrenheit" instruction from a cake recipe and splice it into a salad recipe, it won't accomplish anything because there's no instruction to put the salad in the oven. Similarly, you can't just graft the "wing gene" into the human genome because there is no such animal.
 
I wonder how much stories were written, that involve space fighters, and arent so soft as Star wars. I dont think missiles totally make fighter craft obsolate, for example the former cant escort shuttles if one wants to capture a celestial body. I dont insist fighters have to be manned (i enjoyed Enders game about someone control the events for afar) but i also think it isnt totally unjustifiable.
I thought I had discovered a giant plot hole in Avatar universe, but apparently it's based on a faulty notion. So, the anti-gravity effect that lifts whole mountains into the sky is unrelated to the unobtanium deposits? Apparently the value of unobtanium is in its property as a room temperature superconductor, which enables their superluminal drive technology. Unobtanium is found in large deposits underground, which is why they want to mine the ground. OK. So, these mountains - which...
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?
Back
Top