Can We Harness Dark Energy and Further Innovate Existing Energy Sources?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AchillesWrathfulLove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Future
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for innovation in energy sources, questioning whether all possible energy sources have been discovered or if improvements can still be made to existing ones like wind, solar, and nuclear. While nuclear energy is considered to have some room for improvement, particularly in safety and cost, the consensus is that significant new energy sources are unlikely to emerge. The idea of harnessing dark energy is dismissed as currently unfeasible. Renewable energy and advancements in energy storage are highlighted as critical for future development, along with the need for optimizing the power grid for new energy flows. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of refining existing technologies rather than expecting groundbreaking discoveries.
AchillesWrathfulLove
Messages
30
Reaction score
6
Do you think we have discovered all that there is to discover in terms of energy sources? Can we now only improve on these discovered energy sources like wind, solar, nuclear etc

Is nuclear energy still a young thing where there is lots of room to improve? What about dark energy, can we harness that?

It was once a high school dream of mine to work on this topic so it still lingers in my head and makes me wonder about it...

What are your thoughts? Do you have any ideas of your own that could improve current energy harnessing technology or maybe something "brand new" that could be discovered or harnessed etc...

Thanks in advance for your opinions!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes AchillesWrathfulLove
AchillesWrathfulLove said:
Do you think we have discovered all that there is to discover in terms of energy sources? Can we now only improve on these discovered energy sources like wind, solar, nuclear etc
Well, we haven't been able to master fusion power yet. But other than that, I don't think there is much new out there. Nothing I can think of that we use today is less than 50 years old and even most of the newer ones (like nuclear fission) include elements of technology a century or many centuries old.
Is nuclear energy still a young thing where there is lots of room to improve?
There is some room to improve, but not much; mostly in terms of safety and cost.
What about dark energy, can we harness that?
No.
 
  • Like
Likes AchillesWrathfulLove
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Back
Top