Can we imagine that momentum is the total energy stored in the body at

AI Thread Summary
Momentum cannot be equated to total energy stored in a body at a specific velocity, as they are distinct concepts. Momentum is defined as p = mv, while kinetic energy is given by E = (1/2) mv², with momentum being the derivative of energy with respect to velocity. The relationship between force and momentum is expressed through Newton's second law, F = dp/dt, highlighting that both force and mass influence an object's motion. Conservation of momentum can be derived from conservation of energy without directly involving forces, indicating that momentum is conserved across different frames of reference. Ultimately, momentum reflects the effort required to change an object's state of motion.
amaresh92
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
can we imagine that momentum is the total energy stored in the body at a particular velocity?if not then why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Not really, although they are related. The definition of momentum is
p = m v
while the kinetic energy of a body is
E = (1/2) m v2.

You may notice, if you know calculus, that p = dE/dv.
The second law of Newton is actually
F = dp/dt,
i.e. the force is the (instantaneous) change in momentum in time. When the mass of an object is constant, this reduces to F = ma.

Basically it expresses the ancient experimental fact that to move an object, not only the force that you extert determines the velocity it will get, but also the mass matters. In Egyptian terms, kicking a cat is easier than moving a pyramid :)
 


Momentum as far as I've read is best defined as the property of a body of mass M to move at a speed V given a certain impetus P. So the momentum stored in a body gives it the ability to move at a certain velocity. Kinetic Energy can be defined as the rate of translation of momentum or the measure of the amount of "activity" in a body due to its motion.
 


Momentum is related to the integral of a force over a time integral dt:

∫F dt = mv

Total energy is related to the integral of a force over a displacement dx:

∫F dx = ½mv2

Bob S
 


i could not understand your last sentence if i have commit any mistake theni am sorry for that.
 


What is possible is to derive conservation of momentum using only conservation of energy without invoking forces. Suppose we have in one frame of reference:

1/2 m1 v1^2 + 1/2 m2 v2^2 = 1/2 m1 v1'^2 + 1/2 m2 v2'^2

Here the velocities are vectors, square means inner product of the vector with itself. In another frame of reference moving with velocity U the conservation of energy equation reads:

1/2 m1 (v1-U)^2 + 1/2 m2 (v2-U)^2 =

1/2 m1 (v1'-U)^2 + 1/2 m2 (v2'-U)^2

f you expand out the squares, use conservaton of energy in the original frame and conservation of mass, you are left with the double inner product terms. Then noting that U is arbitrary, you are led to the conclusion that momentum is conserved.
 


You do not necessarily have to expend energy to bring a traveling body to a complete halt.

Nevertheless you have to apply effort to do this.

Momentum can be thought of as a measure the the amount of 'effort' required.
 
Back
Top