Can we see atoms? How do we know they exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SF49erfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms
AI Thread Summary
Atoms and subatomic particles like electrons and protons cannot be seen directly with the naked eye, but their existence is confirmed through various scientific tools and methods that enhance our perception. The understanding of atomic structure has developed over time through extensive observations and experiments, leading to a robust model of atomic behavior. Techniques such as X-ray imaging allow scientists to visualize the positions of atoms in materials, reinforcing the evidence of their existence. The discussion emphasizes that detection of atoms is more critical than visual observation, as scientific knowledge often relies on indirect evidence. Overall, the existence and behavior of atoms are well-supported by experimental data and theoretical frameworks.
SF49erfan
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We "see" atoms by using tools to enhance our built-in senses. So "yes" we can see atoms etc. just like we can see anything that is invisible without some sort of equipment.

The picture we have of atoms and similar is a model built up over lots of observations over a long time with a variety of equipment - at each stage establishing what is going on.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/can-see-atom/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeUmrK92ZIA
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AAAmelia said:
Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?

The existence of atoms involves MORE than just what you can (or cannot) see with your eyes! The accurate description of the atomic energy levels when compared to experiments is one VERY strong and compelling reasons why we know they exist the way we have understood it.

Zz.
 
Trave11er said:
Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.


Very cool. Thanks for posting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trave11er said:
Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.


phinds said:
Very cool. Thanks for posting.

likewise
thankyou -- amazing what they can achieve these days

here's the longer video showing the making of the movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBpu4OPw6bM

Dave
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AAAmelia: Our theory of atoms took a long time to develop. There was evidence matter was made of atoms long before we could see them. Wikipedia has a short history which details some of the early evidence that persuaded people matter was made of atoms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom#History

Perhaps skip any bits you don't understand.
 
ZapperZ said:
The existence of atoms involves MORE than just what you can (or cannot) see with your eyes!
I'd flip that over and say that in experimental sciences, very little (close to nothing) is based on what can be seen with our eyes.
 
  • #11
AAAmelia said:
Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?

probably better to ask can we detect atoms rather that can we see.
you do not need to see with your eyes to know something exists.
 
  • #12
Emilyjoint said:
probably better to ask can we detect atoms rather that can we see.
you do not need to see with your eyes to know something exists.

I have never seen the back of my neck bit I can be pretty certain it's there.
 
  • #13
X-rays are used to make images that show the positions of Atoms in crystals. X-rays are like light, em waves, so their images would be similar to light if it produced images.
 
  • #14
From OP's statistics page:
Last Activity: Aug12-13 11:53 PM
 
  • #15
sophiecentaur said:
I have never seen the back of my neck bit I can be pretty certain it's there.

Mirrors don't work for you? Maybe it's time to start a thread on experimental investigation of vampirism and related phenomena...

(In case it's not obvious... I'm poking fun at the thread not you :smile:)
 
  • #16
I don't believe in mirrors or CCTV.
 
  • #17
Mark44 said:
Starting a thread and never returning to it.

Hi guys - I don't mean to "hit and run" as you call it and I apologize if that is the traditional forum etiquette here to return to a thread to post afterwards.

I was quite busy with school and had forgotten to check back, but with my other threads I did actually read people's responses. I may not always post back, but I don't mean at all to imply that I was ungrateful for everyone's thoughts! It might just mean that I was either very busy and/or I may have read the responses and thought "Great!"

I guess sometimes I just think it's OK to not respond, since it might be a "waste" of people's time for me to just say, "AWESOME!" or something like that, but I shall try in the future here to at least let folks know I got their messages. I actually do genuinely appreciate people's thoughts and have learned some things from these forums. Thanks a bunch again!
 
  • #18
davenn said:
likewise
thankyou -- amazing what they can achieve these days

here's the longer video showing the making of the movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBpu4OPw6bM

Dave

I just watched both videos as well and they were very cool!

Neat how they used an existing atom(s) to move the still atom by getting them to chemically react in creating that movie!

As a follow-up question, do university chemistry/physics courses allow use of these super powerful "tools" for viewing atoms?
 
  • #19
AAAmelia said:
I guess sometimes I just think it's OK to not respond, since it might be a "waste" of people's time for me to just say, "AWESOME!" or something like that

That's what the "thanks" button is for :smile: :smile:
 
  • #20
Hi guys - I don't mean to "hit and run" as you call it and I apologize if that is the traditional forum etiquette here to return to a thread to post afterwards.

that's the etiquette of life, not just this forum :smile:

I guess sometimes I just think it's OK to not respond, since it might be a "waste" of people's time for me to just say, "AWESOME!" or something like that,

no that's just rude :wink:

its ALWAYS polite to acknowledge responses when a question is asked and answered

if you DONT answer how are we all to know that our posts helped you or not ??
it leaves us all wondering ... ummm wonder if he/she understood ??

happy New Year from Sydney, Australia

Dave
 
  • #21
Afaics, if the OP doesn't return after a page or two of thread then it's open season. The thing to do, if you really don't know much about the subject you post a question about, you should make that clear. If you are already half way there then I feel you should word the question appropriately (say, with some Maths). It's all too easy to give an answer that's way below or above what the OP wants and that can frustrate everyone.
I have read some excellent questions that start off "I am doing AS Physics and I have just come across a problem with the Photoelectric effect . . . . ." We all know where we stand then and the OP will probably have got the answer after a couple of responses.
 
  • #22
Trave11er said:
Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.


Thanks again for this video, Very cool.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
AAAmelia said:
Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?

There are some photos of atoms and molecules

29194901.jpg

triptych350.jpg

http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/inline/the-shape-of-atoms_1.jpg


http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21829194.900-smile-hydrogen-atom-youre-on-quantum-camera.html#.UsUzR41M84M

http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2013/05/30/scientists-capture-first-images-of-molecules-before-and-after-reaction/

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-shape-of-atoms
 
  • #24
sophiecentaur said:
Afaics, if the OP doesn't return after a page or two of thread then it's open season. The thing to do, if you really don't know much about the subject you post a question about, you should make that clear. If you are already half way there then I feel you should word the question appropriately (say, with some Maths). It's all too easy to give an answer that's way below or above what the OP wants and that can frustrate everyone.
I have read some excellent questions that start off "I am doing AS Physics and I have just come across a problem with the Photoelectric effect . . . . ." We all know where we stand then and the OP will probably have got the answer after a couple of responses.

Makes sense! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top