Can we solve for x(t) and y(t) with respect to time?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster discusses a problem involving a point mass sliding on a friction-free curve defined by the equation y = e^{-x}. The inquiry focuses on whether it is possible to determine the position (x, y) as a function of time, starting from specific initial conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use conservation of energy to derive expressions for the velocities in terms of x and y. They express the problem in terms of integrals but encounter difficulties with closed-form solutions. Other participants question the correctness of the derived expressions and suggest alternative approaches.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, correcting each other's expressions, and exploring the implications of their findings. There is a recognition that the integrals involved may not be solvable in closed form, and some participants suggest considering different curves for potential solutions.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the integrals and the possibility that numerical methods may be necessary for further exploration. The discussion reflects a mix of theoretical inquiry and practical considerations regarding the solvability of the problem.

Sotiris Michos
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I would like to ask a question I was discussing the other day with a friend of mine. Suppose you have a point mass m, sliding on the friction-free curve y = e^{-x} starting from position x(0) = 0 and y(0) = 1 with zero initial velocity. Can we find in closed-form the exact position (x,y) with respect to time?

2. The attempt at a solution
Going down the usual path, from conservation of energy I found that v = \sqrt{2g(1-y)}. Assuming φ is the angle between \vec{v} and the downward vertical direction (the direction of negative ordinates), and using that \dot{x} = v \sin(φ), \dot{y} = v \cos(φ), φ = \tan^{-1}(e^{x}), I reached

\dot{x} = \sqrt{2g}\sqrt{\frac{e^{2x}-e^{x}}{e^{2x}+1}}
\dot{y} = -y\sqrt{2g}\sqrt{\frac{1-y}{1+y^2}}

From these two, I need to solve only one. Choosing the first, separating dx and dy and integrating, yields

\int_0^{x(t)}\sqrt{\frac{e^{2x} + 1}{e^{2x} - e^{x} }}dx = \sqrt{2g}t

However, plugging the integral in the LHS in Mathematica doesn't compute anything, most likely meaning that this integral is not solvable in closed form, let alone invertible in closed-form.

Choosing now the second equation and doing the same yields:
\int_1^{y(t)}\sqrt{\frac{1+y^2}{1 - y}}\frac{dy}{y} = - \sqrt{2g}t

Again, trying to compute the integral in the LHS, gives an assortment of complex elliptic integrals that are gain not invertible in some closed-form. Any thoughts about what can be done?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You reached $$
\dot{x} = \sqrt{2g}\sqrt{\frac{e^{2x}-1}{e^{2x}+1}}$$
but I reach something else ( from ##\ \ e^{2x}(1-e^{-x})\ \ ## under the square root in the numerator ).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sotiris Michos
BvU said:
You reached $$
\dot{x} = \sqrt{2g}\sqrt{\frac{e^{2x}-1}{e^{2x}+1}}$$
but I reach something else ( from ##\ \ e^{2x}(1-e^{-x})\ \ ## under the square root in the numerator ).

Thank you for replying BvU! You are absolutely correct ##\dot{x}## is not the one I wrote but
$$\dot{x} = \sqrt{2g}\sqrt{\frac{e^{2x}-e^{x}}{e^{2x}+1}} = \sqrt{2g}\sqrt{\frac{1-e^{-x}}{1+e^{-2x}}}$$
I also noted that ##\dot{y}## needs a minus in order for ##\dot{y} = -e^{-x}\dot{x} = -y \dot{x}## to hold. I will correct the initial post! However, after this correction, things get even more challenging, since the integral now is not analytically computable!
 
:welcome:

Did someone promise you there would be an elegant looking analytical solution ?
If you want that, you might look at a cycloid instead of an exponential :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sotiris Michos
BvU said:
:welcome:

Did someone promise you there would be an elegant looking analytical solution ?
If you want that, you might look at a cycloid instead of an exponential :rolleyes:

Haha! :smile:None indeed BvU! As I said, it is just an inquiry I had with a friend of mine the other day. It surprised me that the only method I could find involved integration and then inversion of the result so I thought that I might be going down the wrong path. At best, there should be a way to acquire the solution in some integral form and then let numerical integration take over!

Thank you for your warm welcoming message! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K