Can we tell when a Star has died the moment it happens?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GKDAIR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment Star
AI Thread Summary
Light from distant stars, such as those in the Andromeda Galaxy, takes millions of years to reach Earth, meaning we see them as they were in the past. If a star were to die today, we would remain unaware until the light from that event traveled to us, which could take millions of years. For our Sun, changes take about 8 minutes to be observed on Earth, highlighting the delay in our perception of cosmic events. The discussion emphasizes that stellar changes are not instantaneous but rather gradual processes that unfold over extended periods. Ultimately, the time it takes for light to reach us means we are always looking into the past when observing stars.
GKDAIR
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Light just now reaching us from Andromeda Galaxy was created literally millions of years ago, around 2.5 to be in the ballpark.

When you look at a star, you're literally looking at the past.

That means tonight, when we look up, The light that let's us see Andromeda was created when the genus Homo first appeared here on Earth.


Is it possible that Andromenda, or any other star for that matter, could be dead and gone, but we don't know about it because the light hasn't traveled far enough yet?

Like for example, if Andromeda just suddenly died today, would we know about it? Or would we not find out until 2.5 million years from now and suddenly realize we can't see it anymore

Hopefully I'm phrasing my question correctly.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes we only see the light that was emitted 2.5 million years ago, if andromeda or anyother star went supernova today we won't know until enough time has past for that light to reach us. The time in years is the same as the number of light years away the object is. Even for our own Sun the light is 8 minutes old by the time we see it here on earth.
 
Trollcast basically summed it up. Even when our Sun becomes a red giant, we will not be able to tell until about 8 minutes after the actual event. But at the point we find it out. We will all be killed so it really won't matter.
 
Ah, that's what I figured. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
ConnorL0404 said:
Trollcast basically summed it up. Even when our Sun becomes a red giant, we will not be able to tell until about 8 minutes after the actual event. But at the point we find it out. We will all be killed so it really won't matter.

Well... to be clear, becoming a red giant is a continual process that takes thousands to millions of years once it's started, not an event that just suddenly happens.

But yes, it takes 8 minutes for any changes in the sun to reach us.
 
I remember reading a very short SciFi story about a mage who told his emperor he discovered how to make a star disappear. Emperor pointed to some star and asked the mage to do his trick. And the mage did, but the star was still twinkling...

If memory serves me well story didn't end up good for the mage. Emperor had some disappearing tricks ready too, and because of the much smaller distance their effects were visible instantly.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top