Can you add potentials if charge redistributes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amiras
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Potentials
AI Thread Summary
When two charged conductors are brought close together, their surface charges redistribute, altering their potential energy functions. It is not valid to simply add the isolated potential energy functions of the conductors, as this would imply a non-zero electric field inside the conductors, leading to current flow and further charge redistribution. The assumption of static charge distribution fails in this scenario, making the superposition principle inapplicable. To understand the relationship between the potentials and the physics involved, reference to Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" is suggested. The discussion emphasizes that the issue lies in the physics of charge distribution rather than purely mathematical considerations.
amiras
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Let say we have charged conductor M and we know its potential energy function Vm(r) when M is isolated from any charges. We also have charged conductor N with potential energy function Vn(r) when it is isolated.

Now we put objects M and N close together, the charges on their surfaces redistribute. I am interested in potential energy at every point in space, can I still add potential energy functions (Vm + Vn) to find that?

I'd like to think that it is possible to add functions like that, but I can't find a way of proving it mathematically yet. Any ideas of how to show this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you can't do that. When the charges redistribute, the associated potential functions change. The new potentials can be added but they will be different from the original potentials.
 
Last edited:
Could you show that mathematically or find some kind of contradiction, because I am having difficulties finding easy-calculable one.
 
If you move the charge distribution, the potentials created by those charges will change as well.
 
amiras said:
Could you show that mathematically or find some kind of contradiction, because I am having difficulties finding easy-calculable one.

The issue is not about mathematics, it's about physics. Of course if you assume the charge does not redistribute, you can use superposition. But if the charges are distributed over the surface of finite-sized conductors, that is probably a bad assumption.
 
amiras said:
Could you show that mathematically or find some kind of contradiction,
The contradiction is that if you simply add the isolated potentials you will wind up with a non-zero E field inside the conductor. This will lead to a current and therefore a redistribution of charges.
 
The physics and the math for working with potentials and conductors can be found in Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics", chapters 2 and 3.

The explanations for each of the comments above will be found there as well.
 
Back
Top