MHB Can you calculate the total mass of three parcels at a post office?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total mass of three parcels at a post office, where the first parcel weighs y grams, the second is 500 grams heavier, and the third is 210 grams lighter. The total mass is expressed as 3y + 290 grams. When the total mass is set to 2 kg, the equation 2000 = 3y + 290 is derived. The individual masses of the parcels are calculated to be 570 grams for the first, 1070 grams for the second, and 360 grams for the third. There is a critique regarding the clarity of the variable y and the lack of detailed work shown in the solution.
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
At a post office, there are three parcels of different masses. The mass of the first parcel is y grams. The mass of the second parcel is 500 grams greater than that of the first parcel. The third parcel is 210 grams lighter than the first parcel.

a) Find the total mass, in grams, of the three parcels in terms of y.

My answer: y + (y + 500) + (y - 210) = 3y + 290b) the total mass of the three parcels is 2kg. find the mass of each parcel in grams.

my answer: 2000 = 3y + 290.

1st = 570
2nd = 1070
3rd = 360
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Johnx said:
At a post office, there are three parcels of different masses. The mass of the first parcel is y grams. The mass of the second parcel is 500 grams greater than that of the first parcel. The third parcel is 210 grams lighter than the first parcel.

a) Find the total mass, in grams, of the three parcels in terms of y.

My answer: y + (y + 500) + (y - 210) = 3y + 290b) the total mass of the three parcels is 2kg. find the mass of each parcel in grams.

my answer: 2000 = 3y + 290.

1st = 570
2nd = 1070
3rd = 360

Looks good! (Yes)
 
my answer: 2000 = 3y + 290.

My criticism would be that you have an equation in "y" without saying what "y" represents! You are taking y to be the weight, in grams, of the first package but you should say that. Further you jump immediately to the answer
1st = 570
2nd = 1070
3rd = 360
without showing any work. Can we assume that you showed your work on the paper you turned in?
 
Country Boy said:
without showing any work. Can we assume that you showed your work on the paper you turned in?
Im actually too old to be a school student :-)
 
Country Boy said:
My criticism would be that you have an equation in "y" without saying what "y" represents! You are taking y to be the weight, in grams, of the first package but you should say that.

The problem states:

Johnx said:
The mass of the first parcel is y grams.
 
I completely missed that! But I did get a chance to be a curmudgeon.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top