MHB Can You Crack the Polynomial Challenge VII? Prove 4 Distinct Real Solutions!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around proving that a specific polynomial equation, formed by distinct real numbers p, q, r, s, and t, has four distinct real solutions. Participants share various proofs and approaches to demonstrate the validity of this claim. The equation combines multiple products of linear factors, leading to a polynomial of degree four. Acknowledgment is given to contributors for their efforts in tackling the challenge. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of mathematical problem-solving.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t$ be distinct real numbers. Prove that the equation

$(x-p)(x-q)(x-r)(x-s)+(x-p)(x-q)(x-r)(x-t)+(x-p)(x-q)(x-s)(x-t)+(x-p)(x-r)(x-s)(x-t)+(x-q)(x-r)(x-s)(x-t)=0$

has 4 distinct real solutions.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t$ be distinct real numbers. Prove that the equation

$(x-p)(x-q)(x-r)(x-s)+(x-p)(x-q)(x-r)(x-t)+(x-p)(x-q)(x-s)(x-t)+(x-p)(x-r)(x-s)(x-t)+(x-q)(x-r)(x-s)(x-t)=0$

has 4 distinct real solutions.

Let us call the plynominal on LHS = P(x)
Without loss of generality we can take
$p \lt q \lt r \lt s \lt t$
now $P(p) = (p-q)(p-r)(p-s)(p-t) \gt0$
$P(q) = (q-p)(q-r)(q-s)(q-t) \lt0$
$P(r) = (r-p)(r-q)(r-s)(r-t) \gt0$
$P(s) = (s-p)(s-q)(s-r)(s-t) \lt0$
$P(t) = (t-p)(t-q)(t-r)(t-s) \gt0$
the above 4 says that there is a root in each of the regions (p,q) , (q,r),(r,s),(s,t) and hence all 4 roots are different
 
kaliprasad said:
Let us call the plynominal on LHS = P(x)
Without loss of generality we can take
$p \lt q \lt r \lt s \lt t$
now $P(p) = (p-q)(p-r)(p-s)(p-t) \gt0$
$P(q) = (q-p)(q-r)(q-s)(q-t) \lt0$
$P(r) = (r-p)(r-q)(r-s)(r-t) \gt0$
$P(s) = (s-p)(s-q)(s-r)(s-t) \lt0$
$P(t) = (t-p)(t-q)(t-r)(t-s) \gt0$
the above 4 says that there is a root in each of the regions (p,q) , (q,r),(r,s),(s,t) and hence all 4 roots are different

Well done, kaliprasad, and thanks for participating too!

Here is another proof that is the solution of other great mind:

The LHS of the given equation is the derivative of the function $P(x)=(x-p)(x-q)(x-r)(x-s)(x-t)$, which is continuous and has five distinct real roots.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top