MHB Can you help me find the third zero of this complex polynomial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheFallen018
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Polynomial
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the third zero of a degree 3 complex polynomial, given one complex zero and its conjugate. The user initially misapplies the theorem regarding complex roots, believing that the remaining root must be real. However, it is clarified that the polynomial does not have real coefficients, allowing for the possibility of complex roots. The correct approach involves factoring the polynomial using the known zero, leading to the conclusion that the third zero is -1, which is a double root. The user expresses appreciation for the factoring method, indicating it simplifies the process of finding the roots.
TheFallen018
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hey, first off, I'm not sure if this is the right section. If another section is better, please let me know and I'll be more careful next time.

So, my problem is with a degree 3 complex polynomial. I'm given one zero of the equation, but since it is a complex zero, I can use the conjugate too. So, I already have two of the zeros for the polynomial, and since according to the fundamental theorem of algebra, it should only have one more. Because complex roots also have a conjugate, this suggests that the root is real. However, I'm having a hard time pinning it down. I've come up with a number of answers, and one of my more recent attempts led me to think it was -1. None of these seem right.

So, here's the question.

View attachment 8177

Any help would be amazing. Thank you :)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_15.jpg
    Screenshot_15.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 101
Mathematics news on Phys.org
TheFallen018 said:
Hey, first off, I'm not sure if this is the right section. If another section is better, please let me know and I'll be more careful next time.

So, my problem is with a degree 3 complex polynomial. I'm given one zero of the equation, but since it is a complex zero, I can use the conjugate too. So, I already have two of the zeros for the polynomial, and since according to the fundamental theorem of algebra, it should only have one more. Because complex roots also have a conjugate, this suggests that the root is real. However, I'm having a hard time pinning it down. I've come up with a number of answers, and one of my more recent attempts led me to think it was -1. None of these seem right.

So, here's the question.
Any help would be amazing. Thank you :)

Hi Fallen number 18! ;)

The fact that $-1+2i$ is a zero means that we can factorize the polynomial as $(z-(-1+i2))(z^2 +az+b)$.
When we expand that and match it to the polynomial, we can deduce the values of $a$ and $b$.
Care to try?
 
TheFallen018 said:
Hey, first off, I'm not sure if this is the right section. If another section is better, please let me know and I'll be more careful next time.

So, my problem is with a degree 3 complex polynomial. I'm given one zero of the equation, but since it is a complex zero, I can use the conjugate too.
No, you can't. The theorem you are misremembering is that "if z is a zero of a polynomial with real coefficients then so is its conjugate." But this polynomial does not have real coefficients.

So, I already have two of the zeros for the polynomial, and since according to the fundamental theorem of algebra, it should only have one more. Because complex roots also have a conjugate, this suggests that the root is real. However, I'm having a hard time pinning it down. I've come up with a number of answers, and one of my more recent attempts led me to think it was -1.
Well, yes, with z= -1, z^2= 1, and z^3= -1 so the polynomial becomes -1+ 3- 2i- 3+ 4i+ 1- 2i= (-1+ 3- 3+ 1)+ (-2i+ 4i- 2i)= 0.

None of these seem right.

So, here's the question.
Any help would be amazing. Thank you :)
The fact that -1+ 2i is a root means that x+ 1- 2i will divide into z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) evenly- with no remainder.

In fact, dividing z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) by z+ 1- 2i gives a quotient of z^2+ 2z+ 1= (z+ 1)^2. The zeros of z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) are -1 and -1+ 2i with -1 being a double zero.
 
Last edited:
I like Serena said:
Hi Fallen number 18! ;)

The fact that $-1+2i$ is a zero means that we can factorize the polynomial as $(z-(-1+i2))(z^2 +az+b)$.
When we expand that and match it to the polynomial, we can deduce the values of $a$ and $b$.
Care to try?

I actually already tried this method. I must have done something wrong the first time, because I didn't get the same answer when I did it just now. It worked out to be $(z-(-1+i2))(z^2 +2z+1)$ which worked nicely in the quadratic formula and got me the right answer. Thanks!

Country Boy said:
No, you can't. The theorem you are misremembering is that "if z is a zero of a polynomial with real coefficients then so is its conjugate." But this polynomial does not have real coefficients. Well, yes, with z= -1, z^2= 1, and z^3= -1 so the polynomial becomes -1+ 3- 2i- 3+ 4i+ 1- 2i= (-1+ 3- 3+ 1)+ (-2i+ 4i- 2i)= 0.The fact that -1+ 2i is a root means that x+ 1- 2i will divide into z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) evenly- with no remainder.

In fact, dividing z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) by z+ 1- 2i gives a quotient of z^2+ 2z+ 1= (z+ 1)^2. The zeros of z^3+ (3- 2i)z^2+ (3- 4i)z+ (1- 2i) are -1 and -1+ 2i with -1 being a double zero.

I really like this method. It hadn't occurred to me to factorise the z terms that way. It makes dividing really easy, and then it's just a matter of using the quadratic formula. Thanks for the insight on this one, I'll be using it again for sure.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top