Can You Identify the Scientist Behind This Formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a game where participants guess the scientists associated with various scientific formulas. The conversation begins with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, represented by the formula σ(x)σ(p) ≥ ħ/2, which is quickly identified. Participants then share other formulas, including Fermi's Golden Rule and the Clausius-Mossotti equation, with hints provided to guide guesses. The Wigner-Eckart theorem is also mentioned, along with discussions of more obscure formulas like the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem and the Bondi energy. The game encourages engagement through a playful exchange of scientific knowledge, with participants taking turns presenting and guessing formulas.
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
22,169
Reaction score
3,327
Do you know this formula??

Let's try to make a little game out of scientific formulas. The idea is that I post a scientific formula which is named after a famous scientist. The goal is to guess the scientist(s) associated with the formula.

The person who answers correctly, gets to present a new formula. Etc.

So let's start easy:

\sigma(x)\sigma(p)\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}
 
Physics news on Phys.org


micromass said:
Let's try to make a little game out of scientific formulas. The idea is that I post a scientific formula which is named after a famous scientist. The goal is to guess the scientist(s) associated with the formula.

The person who answers correctly, gets to present a new formula. Etc.

So let's start easy:

\sigma(x)\sigma(p)\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}

Heisenberg!
 


kevinferreira said:
Heisenberg!

Of course! :approve:

You can put up a new formula if you want!
 


Ok, here it goes a nice (but long) one, with a nice name too:

<br /> \frac{d}{dt}P_{m\rightarrow n}(t)=2\pi |\langle n|H_{int}|m\rangle |^2 \rho(E)<br />
 


Would that be Fermi's Golden Rule?

Here's one that's perhaps not so famous, but has a name that makes me smile when I see it:

$$\frac {n^2 - 1}{n^2 + 2} = \frac{4 \pi}{3} N \alpha$$

Hint: it's named after two people whose names are very very similar.
 


micromass said:
So let's start easy

I was uncertain, but I thought you might be looking for a deviation from standard nomenclature.
 


jtbell said:
Would that be Fermi's Golden Rule?

Here's one that's perhaps not so famous, but has a name that makes me smile when I see it:

$$\frac {n^2 - 1}{n^2 + 2} = \frac{4 \pi}{3} N \alpha$$

Hint: it's named after two people whose names are very very similar.


Clausius-Mossotti?

How about this:
$$ \left\langle \alpha' j'm'|T^{(k)}_{q}|\alpha j m \right\rangle = \frac{\left\langle \alpha' j'||T^{(k)}||\alpha j \right\rangle}{\sqrt{2j'+1}}\left\langle kjqm|kjj'm'\right\rangle $$
 


Dr Transport said:
Clausius-Mossotti?

That's one name for it, but not the name I was thinking of.
 


jtbell said:
That's one name for it, but not the name I was thinking of.

Lorentz-Lorenz equation?

No idea about Dr Transport his formula though...
 
  • #10


micromass said:
Lorentz-Lorenz equation?

No idea about Dr Transport his formula though...

hint: one of the people this formula is named for wrote a very well known group theory book
 
  • #11


Dr Transport said:
$$ \left\langle \alpha' j'm'|T^{(k)}_{q}|\alpha j m \right\rangle = \frac{\left\langle \alpha' j'||T^{(k)}||\alpha j \right\rangle}{\sqrt{2j'+1}}\left\langle kjqm|kjj'm'\right\rangle $$

Wigner-Eckart Theorem.

I recognized this as soon as I saw it, but I have been too lazy to think of my own puzzle.
 
  • #12


Okay,

\int \liminf_{n\rightarrow +\infty} |f_n| d\mu\leq \liminf_{n\rightarrow +\infty} \int |f_n|d\mu

Thanks, micromass.
 
  • #13
Fatou's lemma.chi(L) = [e^(ch(L)).Todd(X)](dim(X)). (3 names)Here's a rather obscure one physics students of Paul Bamberg at Harvard in the 1960's all knew:

617-495-9560 (Bamberg's number)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Wannabe: I just noticed you have to answer the previous one to get to post a question.
 
  • #15
mathwonk said:
Wannabe: I just noticed you have to answer the previous one to get to post a question.
Oh, well in that case I have no idea what your formula is lol...Newton's 2nd law is out of the question innit :)? (I deleted my post by the way)

EDIT: is it the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #16
yes! (I got it wrong myself, thinking it was Grothendieck Riemann Roch.)
 
  • #17
Yay! Ok mine will still be ##\xi_{[a}\nabla_{b]}\kappa = 0##
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #18
WannabeNewton said:
Yay! Ok mine will still be ##\xi_{[a}\nabla_{b]}\kappa = 0##

zeroth law of black hole thermodynamics

##E = -\lim_{S_{\alpha}\rightarrow \mathcal{P}}\frac{1}{8\pi}\int _{S_{\alpha}}\epsilon_{abcd}\nabla^{c}\xi^{d}##
 
  • #19
PhizKid said:
##E = -\lim_{S_{\alpha}\rightarrow \mathcal{P}}\frac{1}{8\pi}\int _{S_{\alpha}}\epsilon_{abcd}\nabla^{c}\xi^{d}##

Why, that's the good ol' Bondi energy, of course!

Here's mine: ##y=mx+b##
 
  • #20
AnTiFreeze3 said:
Here's mine: ##y=mx+b##
Is this the Noetherian current obtained from Lorentz transformations? Seems like it.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #21
WannabeNewton said:
Is this the Noetherian current obtained from Lorentz transformations? Seems like it.

You're getting close!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top