MHB Can You Prove $a > \sqrt[9]{8}$ is a Root of a Polynomial with $1 < a < 2$?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if \(1 < a < 2\) and \(a\) is a root of the polynomial \(x^5 - x - 2 = 0\), then \(a > \sqrt[9]{8}\). Participants acknowledge the importance of maintaining strict inequalities in their proofs. There is a focus on correcting previous misunderstandings regarding the inclusion of equality in the inequality. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in mathematical discussions. Ultimately, the goal is to establish the relationship between the root \(a\) and the value \(\sqrt[9]{8}\).
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $1\lt a \lt 2$, $a$ is a root of the equation $x^5-x-2=0$. Prove that $\large a>\sqrt[9]{8}$.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $1\lt a \lt 2$, $a$ is a root of the equation $x^5-x-2=0$. Prove that $\large a>\sqrt[9]{8}$.

let $f(x) = x^5-x-2=0$ then we have $f(1) = - 2$ , $f(2)= 28$ and $\frac{df}{dx} = 5x^4 -1 >=0$ for $ x> 1$
so f(1) is -ve and f(2) is + ve and f(x) is increasing in given range from 1 2 (other value
$>$ 1 also but we are not bothered)
if $a > \sqrt[9]8$ for a to be root $f(\sqrt[9]8 = \sqrt[3]2)$ is -ve
$f(\sqrt[3]2) = \sqrt[3]2^5 - \sqrt[3]2 -2= 2 *\sqrt[3]2^2 - \sqrt[3]2 - 2\cdots(1)$
Now $\frac{1}{2}(2 + \sqrt[3]2) >= \sqrt{2 \sqrt[3]2}= \sqrt[3]2^2$
or $2 + \sqrt[3]2 >= 2\sqrt[3]2^2$
from (1) and above we have $f(\sqrt[3]2) < 0 $ hence $a > \sqrt[9]8$
 
Well done, kaliprasad! And thanks for participating!(Cool)

My solution:

Since $a$ is a root of the equation $x^5-x-2=0$, we get the relation:

$a^5-a-2=0$

$a^5=a+2$(*)

Since $a$ is a positive real, we can apply the AM-GM inequality to the expression:

$a+2\ge 2\sqrt{2a}$

Now, we replace (*) into the inequality above to obtain:

$a^5\ge 2\sqrt{2a}$

Squaring both sides yields:

$a^{10}\ge 8a$

Again, since $a$ is a positive real, we can divide through the inequality above by $a$, and then taking ninth root on both sides of the inequality and the result follows:

$a^9\ge 8$

$a\ge \sqrt[9]{8}$ (Q.E.D.)
 
anemone said:
Well done, kaliprasad! And thanks for participating!(Cool)

My solution:

Since $a$ is a root of the equation $x^5-x-2=0$, we get the relation: $a\ge \sqrt[9]{8}$ (Q.E.D.)

we are supposed to prove $a\ > \sqrt[9]{8}$
 
kaliprasad said:
we are supposed to prove $a\ > \sqrt[9]{8}$

Ops...it was my bad...I should have realized the strict inequality should be in place but not including the "equal to" sign...

I will re-post my solution here of the correct version of my solution:

anemone said:
My solution:

Since $a$ is a root of the equation $x^5-x-2=0$, we get the relation:

$a^5-a-2=0$

$a^5=a+2$(*)

Since $a$ is a positive real, we can apply the AM-GM inequality to the expression:

$a+2\gt 2\sqrt{2a}$ (since $a\ne 2$)

Now, we replace (*) into the inequality above to obtain:

$a^5\gt 2\sqrt{2a}$

Squaring both sides yields:

$a^{10}\gt 8a$

Again, since $a$ is a positive real, we can divide through the inequality above by $a$, and then taking ninth root on both sides of the inequality and the result follows:

$a^9\gt 8$

$a\gt \sqrt[9]{8}$ (Q.E.D.)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top