MHB Can You Solve This Factor Problem with $x^5+x^4+1$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
factor $x^5+x^4+1$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$$\begin{align} x^5 + x^4 + 1 = x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1 - x^3 - x^2 - x & = x^3(x^2 + x + 1) + 1(x^2 + x + 1) - x (x^2 + x + 1) \\ &= (x^3 - x + 1)(x^2 + x + 1)\end{align}$$

EDIT : In particular, $x^5 + x^4 + 1 = 0 \Rightarrow t^5 + t + 1 = 0$ where $t = 1/x$. $t^n + t + 1$ has always a factor of the form $t^2 + t + 1$ for $t = 2 \bmod 3$.
 
Last edited:
No elegance to this approach, but:

It has no linear factors, so they must factor as:
$$(x^2+ax+b)(x^3+cx^2+dx+e)$$

Solving the resulting system of equations:
$a=1$, $b=1$, $c=0$, $d=-1$, $e=1$

Therefore,
$$x^5+x^4+1=(x^2+x+1)(x^3-x+1)$$
 
Another solution, maybe?

$$x^5 + x^4 + 1 = x^5 + x^4 - x^2 + 1 + x^2 = x^5 - x^2 + x^4 + x^2 + 1 = x^2(x^3 - 1) + (x^4 + x^2 + 1) = x^2(x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1) + (x^2 + x + 1)(x^2 - x + 1) = (x^2 + x + 1)(x^3 - x + 1)$$
 
By rational root theorem it does not have a rational root and so it shall be product of a quadratic function and a cubic function

as it is of the form $x^{3n+2} + x^{3m+1} + 1$ so
$x = \omega$ and $x = \omega^2$ are zeros ($\omega$ is cube root of 1)

$(x-\omega)(x-\omega^2)$ or $x^2 + x + 1$ is a factor and by division

$x^5 + x^4 + 1 = (x^2+x+1)(x^3 - x + 1)$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top