Can Z and U be considered independent in this scenario?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lolypop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distributed
lolypop
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi ,
I got this question in my midterm today but up till now I don't know how to solve it ,

The Question is as follow :
If X and Y are two exponential Rv with different lambda . and there's a new Rvs Z and U are defined such that :

Z= 0 : X<Y and 1 : X=> Y

U= min(X,Y)

and the Question asked to proof that Z and U are independent .

So I started my solution by deriving the pdf of U since I know how to then tried to derive the pdf of Z but didn't know where to start and got stuck . :frown:

Can anyone tell me of a way to derive the pdf of Z . or is there another way to solve the problem ?:rolleyes:

lolypop
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Z is discrete and doesn't have a pdf - one way around is to consider the cdf instead, i.e. show that the joint cdf of Z and U is a product of the marginal cdfs.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top