Cancellation of Poynting vector components

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of the Poynting vector, which represents energy flow in electromagnetic waves. It is confirmed that while components of a single Poynting vector cannot cancel each other, Poynting vectors from different sources can indeed cancel out, resulting in a net Poynting vector of zero. This occurs when two electromagnetic waves of the same frequency travel in opposite directions, creating a standing wave that does not carry energy. The distinction between instantaneous and time-averaged Poynting vectors is important, as well as the need to sum fields rather than intensities in coherent interactions. Overall, the cancellation of energy flow is possible when considering multiple sources.
Karthiksrao
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
If we find the Poynting vector at a point along all possible directions possible, can the different components of the vectors cancel each other, to give a net Poynting vector along some direction?

I was wondering about this because Poynting vector after all represents energy flow. So can energy flow along different directions cancel each other ?

I suppose we can, since energy and momentum are interrelated and I can imagine momentum components canceling. I just wanted to confirm if my thought process is correct.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question can be very misleading as stated. What I think you mean to ask is: Can the Poynting vector from one system cancel the Poynting vector from another system? (Components of a single vector cannot cancel because components are by definition independent.)

The answer is yes. If you have a source emitting an EM wave through a certain space and another source emitting another EM wave through the same space at the same frequency, but in the opposite direction, you get a standing wave. A standing wave does not travel or carry energy, so its average Poynting vector is zero. You can think of it as the Poynting vector of the one wave canceling the other. Although you have to be careful to differentiate between instantaneous Poynting vector and time-averaged. And if there is a coherent interaction of the waves, you have to sum fields, and not intensities.
 
Thanks for the answer.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top