Cancelling the Earths magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
A researcher aims to create a zero magnetic field environment using a solenoid with specific dimensions and wire turns. The initial calculations for the necessary current to cancel Earth's magnetic field were incorrect due to unit misadjustments and formula application errors. The correct formula for the current involves using the Earth's magnetic field value and the permeability constant accurately. The discussion highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics problems, as well as the value of seeking clarification from instructors. Ultimately, the researcher resolved the issue by adjusting the units as required for the problem.
deborahcurrie
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A researcher would like to perform an experiment in a zero magnetic field, which means that the field of the Earth must be cancelled. Suppose the experiment is done inside a solenoid of diameter 1.0{\rm m} , length 5.0{\rm m} , with a total of 9000 turns of wire. The solenoid is oriented to produce a field that opposes and exactly cancels the field of the earth.
What current is needed in the solenoid's wires?


Homework Equations


We use this for B=μ0*I*(N/L) for solenoids.
Bearth=5E-5T
μ0=1.257E-6
N=9000
L=5.0 m



The Attempt at a Solution


I=(B*L)/μu0*N)=(5E-5*5)/(9000*5) = 0.02209=2.2E-2
Mastering Physics says this is incorrect. What did I miss?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula for I looks good. Trouble with the substitution, I think. Looks like the number for u0 didn't go in and there is an extra 5.
 
That was my bad. My actual equation looks like:

(5E-5*5)/(1.257E-6*9000)=0.02209 which is wrong according to Mastering physics. Doesn't like 2.2E-2 either.
 
deborahcurrie said:
Bearth=5E-5T
Earth's field varies greatly from place to place. Is this the value you were told to use?
 
I talked with the instructor and found my error -- I just needed to adjust for units the question required. I usually catch this, but not this time. Thanks for your replies anyways. It's always good to know there is a safety line!
 
deborahcurrie said:
I talked with the instructor and found my error -- I just needed to adjust for units the question required. I usually catch this, but not this time. Thanks for your replies anyways. It's always good to know there is a safety line!
OK, I did wonder about the units. In your post it says e.g. "diameter 1.0{\rm m}". LaTex problem?
PS - I guess you mean the units the answer was required in, like mA?
 
Not sure what a La Tex problem is -- but you are correct on the PS
 
Back
Top