Canonical partition function of an ideal gas (unit analysis)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the unit analysis of the Canonical Partition Function for an ideal gas, emphasizing that the logarithmic terms must be dimensionless. Participants clarify that the units for volume (V) were incorrectly applied, leading to confusion in achieving a unitless solution. The correct formulation involves using the relationship ##\hbar c = 197~{\rm eV\,nm}## and multiplying by ##c^2## to ensure both the numerator and denominator maintain consistent units of (energy x length)^2. Ultimately, the analysis concludes that the units must simplify correctly to achieve the desired dimensionless result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Canonical Partition Function in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with unit analysis in physics
  • Knowledge of fundamental constants such as Planck's constant (ħ) and Boltzmann's constant (kB)
  • Basic grasp of thermodynamic concepts including thermal energy (kBT)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Canonical Partition Function in statistical mechanics
  • Learn about dimensional analysis techniques in physics
  • Explore the implications of using Planck's constant and the speed of light in unit conversions
  • Investigate the relationship between energy and length in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, as well as anyone involved in unit analysis and dimensional consistency in scientific equations.

Somali_Physicist
Messages
117
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Basically the units of the Canonical Partition Function within the logarithms should be zero

Homework Equations


Screen Shot 2018-08-26 at 11.05.50 am.png


The Attempt at a Solution



N here is a number so we ignore the left logarithms, applying a "Unit function " for the terms within the logarithm.

(Fu((mkbTV2/3)/(2πħ2)) ) -3/2 :
The above function can work on each individual portion and spit out the unit values , assuming all the operations act in the same way.

kbT => J (Thermal Energy)
m => Kg
ħ2 => J2s2
V2/3 => J2/3

Now ignoring the power to -3/2 =>
Kg*J*J2/3*s-2*J-2
=> kg*s-2*J-1/3
=> kg2/3s-8/3m-2/3
Now Even if we introduce -3/2 we don't acquire a unitless solution
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-08-26 at 11.05.50 am.png
    Screen Shot 2018-08-26 at 11.05.50 am.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 762
Physics news on Phys.org
Your units for the volume V are wrong.

A useful combination to know is ##\hbar c = 197~{\rm eV\,nm}##. If you multiply the top and bottom by ##c^2## where ##c## is the speed of light, you get
$$\frac{(mc^2)(k_\text{B} T) V^{2/3}}{2\pi(\hbar c)^2}.$$ In that form, it's pretty easy to see that both the numerator and denominator have units of (energy x length)^2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Somali_Physicist
vela said:
Your units for the volume V are wrong.

A useful combination to know is ##\hbar c = 197~{\rm eV\,nm}##. If you multiply the top and bottom by ##c^2## where ##c## is the speed of light, you get
$$\frac{(mc^2)(k_\text{B} T) V^{2/3}}{2\pi(\hbar c)^2}.$$ In that form, it's pretty easy to see that both the numerator and denominator have units of (energy x length)^2.
Volume ! i thought it was potential energy!
Gracias!

well for completeness
Kg * J * m3*2*3-1 *J-2*S-2
=> Kg*J-1*m2*s-2
=> J*J-1 => 1
Note - Kg*m2*s-2 = J
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K