Can't get Hamilton and Lagrangian stuff

AI Thread Summary
Understanding Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics can be challenging, especially when transitioning from simple to complex systems. The key distinction is that while Newtonian mechanics focuses on vectors and forces, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian approaches utilize scalars, specifically energy, simplifying the problem-solving process. These methods are often more effective for complex scenarios, allowing for easier handling of conserved quantities and symmetries. Additionally, they provide flexibility in choosing generalized coordinates, which can streamline calculations. Ultimately, mastering these concepts can enhance the ability to tackle a broader range of physical problems.
finchie_88
I'm really confused when using Hamilton and lagrangian equations, and have read loads of documents on it, but its not getting any clearer, I was hoping someone might be able to help me.
Thanks in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What don't you get? Try to explain to us what you understand. And we'll intercede when you veer off course.
 
I understand the principle of what is happening, its just that I can't come up with the equations myself unless the situation is really simple (like a object falling), anything more complex than that and I get confused. Also, I can't see the point, all it is is another way of writing Newtonian mechanics, what is the benefit of it?
 
finchie_88 said:
I understand the principle of what is happening, its just that I can't come up with the equations myself unless the situation is really simple (like a object falling), anything more complex than that and I get confused. Also, I can't see the point, all it is is another way of writing Newtonian mechanics, what is the benefit of it?

1. Newtonian mechanics deal with VECTORS, as in forces. Lagrangian/Hamiltonian deal with scalars, as in energy. You have ONE less thing to worry about using the latter approach.

2. Because of #1, there are more instances where it is easier to write the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian than to write the Newtonian differential equation of motion. The fact that you are only seeing the introduction to both types of mechanics using simple examples doesn't tell you how well the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian approach is more useful. Wait till you have to deal with more complicated situations.

Zz.
 
finchie_88 said:
Also, I can't see the point, all it is is another way of writing Newtonian mechanics, what is the benefit of it?
more benefits
  • much easier to solve the "roller coaster on a frictionless track" problem... with Newton, you'll have to start by drawing a different Free-Body diagram at each point along the track;
  • "conserved quantities" and "symmetries" are more easily handled.. and exploited;
  • freedom in choosing "[generalized] coordinates" to simplify the mathematics;
  • associated with the "Principle of Stationary Action" (a.k.a. Least Action), which can be used to formulate many theories [optics, electromagnetism, gravitation, other classical field theories]
  • used as a route to Schrodinger and Heisenberg quantum mechanics
When dealing with problems, a good first step is really trying to identify the "degrees of freedom" (i.e., the configuration space) of the system. This suggests a possible set of "generalized coordinates".
Get a hold of the Schaum's outlines on Lagrangian Mechanics.
Flip through http://alamos.math.arizona.edu/~rychlik/557-dir/mechanics/ and http://mitpress.mit.edu/SICM/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top