Cant get units to work out for Momentum Density

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of momentum density as derived from the Nambu-Goto Action in string theory, specifically focusing on the units associated with momentum density and the Lagrangian density.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the expected units of momentum density and question the relationship between the Lagrangian density and momentum. There is a discussion about the implications of integrating over a variable and how that affects the units of the resulting quantity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the units of the Lagrangian and momentum density, while others are seeking further explanation about the concept of density in this context. There appears to be a productive exchange of insights regarding the definitions and relationships between these physical quantities.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific equations in the referenced textbook that may clarify the discussion, indicating that participants are working within the constraints of the material presented in the book.

benbenny
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Excuse the question but I am stuck on this for the past hour.

Im studying Zweibach's "A first Course in String Theory".
From the Nambu-Goto Action he derives the wave equation which consists of the term

[tex]\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{X} ^{\mu}} &= -\frac{T_{0}}{c}\frac{\dot{X} \cdot X')X'_{\mu}-(x')^{2}\dot{X}_{\mu}} {\sqrt{(\dot{X} \cdot X')^{2} - (\dot{X})^{2}(X')^{2}}} \equiv \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}[/tex]

Now this [tex]\mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}[/tex] is referred to as the momentum density and is used as such later on in the book:

[tex]p_\mu(\tau) = \int ^{\sigma _{1}}_{0} \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}(\tau , \sigma) d\sigma[/tex]

Im confused because I would expect [tex]\mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}[/tex] to have units of Mass divided by time, if \sigma has units of length, or units of momentum, if \sigma is dimensionless, so that when you integrate over \sigma you get units of momentum.

But as far as I can see [tex]\mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}[/tex] has units of mass times length. I get would think this because the lagrangian density has units of ML^2/T and it is differentiated with respect to velocity, thus it takes units of ML.

Can someone help with this?

Thanks.

B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
benbenny said:
Im confused because I would expect [tex]\mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}[/tex] to have units of Mass divided by time, if \sigma has units of length, or units of momentum, if \sigma is dimensionless, so that when you integrate over \sigma you get units of momentum.

But as far as I can see [tex]\mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}[/tex] has units of mass times length. I get would think this because the lagrangian density has units of ML^2/T and it is differentiated with respect to velocity, thus it takes units of ML.

Can someone help with this?

Thanks.

B

The author is following the common mechanical notation that the momentum is equal to the velocity derivative of the Lagrangian. However, you error is that the Lagrangian has units of kg m^2/s^2 (not kg m^2/s), so taking the velocity derivative divides those units by m/s giving kg m/s, which are the correct units of momentum.
 
Thanks a lot for your reply!

Then what makes it a momentum density rather than the momentum itself?
I was under the impression that when a quantity is the "density" of something, that means that its units are lacking, but become the units of that something once we integrate over that missing variable.
Best example is mass density which is ks/m. and when we integrate it over a variable measured in m than we get back mass in kg.

can you explain this further to me?

Much appreciated!
 
I haven't studied String Theory, but I pulled that book out from my University's library and just skimmed a couple pages. It seems your answer lies on page 73, Equation (4.34) and (4.35). The item [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex] is the Lagrangian density because you have yet to integrate over space to get the Lagrangian.
So I guess technically there should be an extra unit of length in what I said previously, though the idea/concept of the momentum being the velocity-derivative of the Lagrangian still holds true.

Hope that helps!
 
Yes! thanks for pointing out the page in the book. I've forgotten that this whole section in the book exists that explains all of this specifically. Needed someone from the other side of Earth to remind me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
95
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K