Why Does Sigma(s) Cause Complex Roots in My Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dscot
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of rearranging an equation involving sigma(s), which appears twice, leading to complex roots instead of a single solution. Users note that the expression for sigma(s) is inherently multi-valued and can only yield real results under specific conditions for theta and sigma(l). The original poster expresses frustration over the inability to solve the equation in a lab setting. Responses suggest that while the equation can be solved numerically, real roots can only be found if the other parameters are appropriately constrained. The conversation highlights the importance of identifying physical constraints to potentially eliminate complex solutions.
dscot
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've been having some problems trying to re-arrange this equation for a few days now, the problem is that sigma(s) appears twice in the equation: http://screencast.com/t/dlDwH4eIcp

The problem seems to be that I always end up with complex roots rather than a single equation for sigma(s).

Note the exponential should not be under the square root.

Thank you :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not sure what you are trying to do...

It is pretty obvious from looking at the equation, that an expression for sigma_s will be multi-valued, and will only be real for certain values of theta and sigma_l.
 
Hi f95toli,

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question.

Thats what I was afraid, I'm basically carrying out this experiment in the lab and have all the other values but couldn't get this equation solved for sigma(s).

I'm not too sure what to do if there's no way the equation can be solved?
 
Of course it can be solved. Assuming the other parameters are in the right range you can easily find the real roots by solving it numerically (I am here assuming that there are physical reasons for why sigma_s can't be complex).

Perhaps there are other constraints that will allow you to discard one of the solutions?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top