Capacitor Discharge equation help

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of capacitors in series and parallel configurations, particularly focusing on the discharge equations and energy storage. Participants explore the implications of combining capacitors in different arrangements, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects related to capacitor banks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that combining two capacitors in series results in doubling the voltage and halving the capacitance, while also suggesting that the area under the current-time curve should represent the total energy stored.
  • Others argue that simply placing capacitors in series does not affect voltage and resistance as initially claimed, prompting a request for clarification on the correct properties of capacitors in series and parallel.
  • There is a discussion regarding the equivalent series resistance (ESR) and its implications when capacitors are connected in series, with some participants noting that ESR doubles in this configuration.
  • One participant mentions the need for additional components, such as bleeder resistors, to ensure equal voltage distribution across capacitors in series to prevent overvoltage conditions.
  • Another participant raises a concern about the discharge behavior of capacitors in series, highlighting the risk of uneven voltage drop during discharge and the potential for one capacitor to exceed its voltage rating.
  • A later reply questions whether the area under the current-time curve for two capacitors in series would be the same as for two capacitors in parallel, despite differing configurations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of capacitors in series versus parallel, particularly regarding voltage, capacitance, and energy storage. There is no consensus on the implications of these configurations, and several technical points remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings about the definitions of voltage, resistance, and energy storage in capacitor configurations, as well as the need for additional components to manage voltage distribution in series connections.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals designing capacitor banks for high-current applications, such as rail guns, as well as those studying the theoretical aspects of capacitor behavior in electrical circuits.

axi0m
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I have been testing this equation with various different capacitors and capacitor bank values for V, R and C. I have found that when combining two capacitors in series (V doubles, C is divided in half, R is doubled) the following equation yields the same I-curve over t as a single capacitor. Wouldn't the area of the I curve be equal to the capacitor's (or bank's) total energy? In other words, shouldn't U=It?

I = V/R * e^(-t/RC)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
axi0m said:
I have been testing this equation with various different capacitors and capacitor bank values for V, R and C. I have found that when combining two capacitors in series (V doubles, C is divided in half, R is doubled) the following equation yields the same I-curve over t as a single capacitor. Wouldn't the area of the I curve be equal to the capacitor's (or bank's) total energy? In other words, shouldn't U=It?

I = V/R * e^(-t/RC)

Just putting two caps in series does nothing to the voltage and resistance. you must mean something else in your question?
 
berkeman said:
Just putting two caps in series does nothing to the voltage and resistance. you must mean something else in your question?

Ahhh, I guess I've been gravely mistaken. I was under the belief that when you add two capacitors in:

series, you double the ESR (because two resistors in series double the resistance,) divide capacitance by two, and double the voltage

parallel, you double capacitance, voltage remains the same, and you divide resistance in half

Would it be too much to ask for you to kindly provide me with the proper values of said properties when combining two capacitors in parallel and in series?
 
axi0m said:
Ahhh, I guess I've been gravely mistaken. I was under the belief that when you add two capacitors in:

series, you double the ESR (because two resistors in series double the resistance,) divide capacitance by two, and double the voltage

parallel, you double capacitance, voltage remains the same, and you divide resistance in half

Would it be too much to ask for you to kindly provide me with the proper values of said properties when combining two capacitors in parallel and in series?

Ah, you didn't say that the R in your question was the ESR of the cap(s). Yes, series connecting two identical caps will halve the capacitance and double the ESR. By saying that it will double some voltage, I assume you mean if they are charged up initially and then placed in series still charged. Yes, that will double the voltage.

Are you then shorting them out to use the equation that you posted? The only "R" is the ESR values?
 
berkeman said:
Ah, you didn't say that the R in your question was the ESR of the cap(s). Yes, series connecting two identical caps will halve the capacitance and double the ESR. By saying that it will double some voltage, I assume you mean if they are charged up initially and then placed in series still charged. Yes, that will double the voltage.

Are you then shorting them out to use the equation that you posted? The only "R" is the ESR values?

By doubling voltage, I meant that if you place two 450V max. caps in series, you can now charge the bank up to 900V rather than only 450V.

Yes, they will be shorted-out and there is no additionally resistance in the circuit, other than ESR.
 
axi0m said:
By doubling voltage, I meant that if you place two 450V max. caps in series, you can now charge the bank up to 900V rather than only 450V.

Yes, they will be shorted-out and there is no additionally resistance in the circuit, other than ESR.

Oh, that's different. In general you want to use a single cap with the full voltage rating. If you are placing caps in series to try to get a higher overall voltage rating, you need to do something additional to ensure that the total voltage divides equally across the two lower voltage capacitors. Otherwise, one could have its voltage rating exceeded and blow, and then the other will blow.

You would generally ensure the equal voltage division with large-value resistors that are placed around each cap. Something like 100kOhms around each cap.

Can you not obtain a single cap with the full voltage rating?
 
berkeman said:
Oh, that's different. In general you want to use a single cap with the full voltage rating. If you are placing caps in series to try to get a higher overall voltage rating, you need to do something additional to ensure that the total voltage divides equally across the two lower voltage capacitors. Otherwise, one could have its voltage rating exceeded and blow, and then the other will blow.

You would generally ensure the equal voltage division with large-value resistors that are placed around each cap. Something like 100kOhms around each cap.

Can you not obtain a single cap with the full voltage rating?

Well, I'm designing a cap bank for a rail gun so relatively high ampere currents are desired. Though not yet exacted, said current will probably require a higher voltage than I can find in a cap of sufficient capacitance. So, at this point, I'm trying to configure the best cap bank with regard to series, parallel or a combination.
 
axi0m said:
Well, I'm designing a cap bank for a rail gun so relatively high ampere currents are desired. Though not yet exacted, said current will probably require a higher voltage than I can find in a cap of sufficient capacitance. So, at this point, I'm trying to configure the best cap bank with regard to series, parallel or a combination.
The problem with two caps in series is that during discharge, the voltage on one could drop faster than the other, you could overvoltage one, or even reverse voltage one.. If you do have series caps, put bleeder resistors across them, or if you have many cap-pairs in series, tie the inter-cap connections together.
 
Bob S said:
The problem with two caps in series is that during discharge, the voltage on one could drop faster than the other, you could overvoltage one, or even reverse voltage one.. If you do have series caps, put bleeder resistors across them, or if you have many cap-pairs in series, tie the inter-cap connections together.

I see, thank you guys greatly for the tips. I will be sure to implement them.

On a separate note, since two caps in series contain the same amount of stored energy as two caps in parallel, wouldn't the current-time curve have the same area under the function that is specified in the first post?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K