Capacitor substitution for TEA nitrogen laser

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on substituting strontium titanate ceramic capacitors, rated at 50KVDC and 910pf, for aluminum foil and plastic dielectric capacitors in a TEA nitrogen laser project. The user hypothesizes that using these ceramic capacitors could result in lower losses compared to commercial options. A question is raised regarding the capacitance equivalence of the foil/plastic capacitors to ensure compatibility with the ceramics. The feasibility and performance of high-voltage doorknob capacitors are also considered for this application. Overall, the conversation explores alternative capacitor options for improved efficiency in laser construction.
guipenguin
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
My next project is to build a simple TEA nitrogen laser, as seen here: http://photonics.tfp.uni-karlsruhe.de/1/a-homemade-uv-laser.html

Would it be acceptable to substitute two strontium titanate ceramic caps, each rated 50KVDC @ 910pf, in place of the suggested aluminum foil / plastic dialectic plate caps?

My hypothesis would be if such materials were available than it would be beneficial for lower losses would be encountered with a commercial capacitor.

Let me know what you think about using a couple HV doorknob caps here.

Thanks,
John
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
guipenguin said:
My next project is to build a simple TEA nitrogen laser, as seen here: http://photonics.tfp.uni-karlsruhe.de/1/a-homemade-uv-laser.html

Would it be acceptable to substitute two strontium titanate ceramic caps, each rated 50KVDC @ 910pf, in place of the suggested aluminum foil / plastic dialectic plate caps?

My hypothesis would be if such materials were available than it would be beneficial for lower losses would be encountered with a commercial capacitor.

Let me know what you think about using a couple HV doorknob caps here.

Thanks,
John
What is the capacitance of the foil/plastic capacitors? Equivalent to your ceramics?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top