Capacitor with uniform space charge between them

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field strength between two large plates separated by a distance d, with a uniform space charge density p applied between them and a potential difference V. The derived formula for the electric field at a distance x from the positive plate is -V/d + p(x-2d)/2ε, where ε represents the permittivity of free space (ε₀). The conversation emphasizes the application of Gauss's law to analyze the electric field and the importance of considering charge redistribution and electric flux through Gaussian surfaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts
  • Knowledge of potential difference and its implications
  • Basic principles of electrostatics and charge distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in different geometries
  • Learn about electric field calculations in capacitors with space charges
  • Explore the concept of electric flux and its role in electrostatics
  • Investigate the effects of charge redistribution in electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields in capacitive systems with uniform space charges.

rohanlol7
Messages
66
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



2 large plates are separated by a distance d and a space charge of uniform charge density p is placed between them and a potential difference V is applied across the plates. Find the electric field stength at a distance x fromt the positive plate
The answer is -V/d +p(x-2d)/2e ( e = epsiolon0)

Homework Equations


gauss law

The Attempt at a Solution


using gauss law:
EA = Qenc/e, Qenc = A*g + charge inside my box, which i can't seem to find, since i have no idea how all the charge will redistribute, I'm guessing some will go onto the plates, or maybe they will redistrubute so as to create an opposing field of equal magnitude to the external field...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rohanlol7 said:
... since i have no idea how all the charge will redistribute ...
Suppose the charges are fixed and do not redistribute. What would your answer be in that case?
 
kuruman said:
Suppose the charges are fixed and do not redistribute. What would your answer be in that case?
-V/d + px/e
 
rohanlol7 said:
px/e
How did you find this? DId you consider the electric flux through both sides of the Gaussian surface?
 
kuruman said:
Suppose the charges are fixed and do not redistribute. What would your answer be in that case?
kuruman said:
How did you find this? DId you consider the electric flux through both sides of the Gaussian surface?
no i didn't. So if i try and consider this, does is go like this ? the E field going from the positive plate will be -V/2d + px/e and through the left that should give -V/2d -p(d-x)/e and adding those two would give -V/d + pd/e ?
 
You have to be careful here. Suppose you only have the space charge. The electric field at a point equidistant from the two ends must be zero because you have as much charge on the left side as on the right. Therefore, whatever expression you find for the space charge electric field contribution alone must give zero at x = d/2. Do you agree?
 
kuruman said:
You have to be careful here. Suppose you only have the space charge. The electric field at a point equidistant from the two ends must be zero because you have as much charge on the left side as on the right. Therefore, whatever expression you find for the space charge electric field contribution alone must give zero at x = d/2. Do you agree?
yes i definitely do agree, i did realize that if its at a point x then a further distance of x on the other side will cancel that E field, however I'm not sure how to go around formulating that properly mathematically properly
 
Consider a Gaussian surface with one edge at d/2. Call that x = 0 (temporarily). The other edge of the surface is at x to its right. Use Gauss's law to find the field through the surface at x. Move the origin to the zero that the problem has defined by transforming x → x - d/2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
769
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K