Capacitors in Parallel and Series

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the charge on capacitors in a combination circuit with a total capacitance of 1.34uF and a potential difference of 300V. Participants clarify the circuit layout, which includes a 3uF capacitor leading to a series combination of 2uF and 5uF, parallel to a 1uF capacitor. The total charge calculated is 402uC, and the voltage division rule is emphasized for finding the voltage across each capacitor. To determine the charge on each capacitor, the formula Q = CV is used, along with voltage division to find the voltage across the 3uF and the parallel combination. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding circuit flow and applying the correct formulas for accurate calculations.
meadow
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello. I have a brain fart and this combination circuit has me stumped. Here is a crude representation of the circuit. I had no problem finding the total capacitance (1.34uF), but the second part asks you to find the charge on each of the capacitors, assuming that the potential difference between b and a is 300 V.

2uF 5uF
----||------||----
a.---| |----- ----.b
3uF ------||----------
1uF
Ok, I know that the Q2=Q5 and Q3=Q7. The total charge is 402 uC, so Q3=Q7=402uF. Where do I go from here. I have tried all combinations...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, I don't see that circuit of yours. Could you go maybe by circuit flow :P
 
oops!

The circuit from point a goes to a capacitor of 3uF, then leads to 2 capacitors in series (2uF and 5uF) that are together parallel to a capacitor of 1uF. From the parallel circuit section you get to point b. Does that make sense? I tried to draw it out...but I guess it didn't work:) Thanks!
 
So 3uF+( (2uF + 5uF)//(1uF ) ?
Your diagram just suggests otherwise. Anyway.
To calculate the charge on a capacitor in steady state, you use:

Q = CV

The only problem then would be finding V across each capacitor.
The voltage division rule applies to capacitors as V1 = C2/(C1+C2)
 
  1. With equivalent capacitance, first calculate charge with Q=CV.
  2. Then calculate voltage across 3uF using V=Q(as obtained above)/3uF
  3. Voltage across the parallel combination of 1uF with series combination of 2uF and 5uF will Vab (300v)-V(across 3uF, as obtained above, in step 2). This will be voltage across 1UF.
  4. Using voltage division formula calculate voltages across 2uF and 5uF; sum of voltages across 2uF and 5Uf will be same as voltage across 1uF
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top