Car Radio Waves & Doppler Effect: Disruption?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anzas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Radio
AI Thread Summary
Radio waves received by a moving car do experience a Doppler shift, but the effect is negligible due to the vast difference between car speeds (2-3 m/s) and the speed of light (3x10^8 m/s). This tiny shift, around 2-3 cm for FM signals, is well within the bandwidth of typical radio broadcasts and does not disrupt reception. Car radios, especially FM receivers, are designed to lock onto signals and can adjust to frequency shifts, making them resilient to minor Doppler effects. For AM broadcasts, the frequency deviation can be tolerated even more, allowing for acceptable demodulation. Overall, the Doppler effect on car radios is undetectable and does not impact signal quality.
Anzas
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
if a car with a radio is moving at some speed and it receives radio waves shouldn't these waves get Doppler shifted and the radio signal be disrupted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anzas said:
if a car with a radio is moving at some speed and it receives radio waves shouldn't these waves get Doppler shifted and the radio signal be disrupted?

Yes, the radio waves are doppler shifted but the shift depends on the ratio of v/c which you can see leads to a VERY tiny shift (put some numbers into convince yourself!) The shift is entirely negligible compared with the bandwidth of any radio signal.
 
In theory yes. However car speeds are around 2 - 3 meters per sec, while the speed of light is 3x108 meters per sec. FM signal is typically 108 cm. A 2 - 3 cm shift would not be noticed.
 
Anzas said:
if a car with a radio is moving at some speed and it receives radio waves shouldn't these waves get Doppler shifted and the radio signal be disrupted?
For AM broadcasts you can be 'way off in the frequency and still demodulate the signal acceptably.

For FM broadcasts, it's so hard to keep a typical receiver on frequency that nearly all of them "lock onto" the signal and then follow it if the frequency shifts. Typical radios, particularly car radios, will follow the signal far from its "home frequency" before they give up on it. (Actually, this behavior probably falls out of the use of a phase locked loop to demodulate the signal -- once it's locked onto a particular signal it tends to stay there.)

So, combined with the fact that the shifts are very, very tiny, as other posters have already pointed out, the effect will be totally undetectable.
 
A car actually goes 20-30 meters per second mathman (65 mph is roughly 30 m/s).
 
The shift is enough to get you a traffic ticket as this is how radar works.
Radar is just a specialized form of radio.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top