Cardinality of a vector space over an infinite field

yaa09d
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Let V be a vector space over an infinite field $\mathbf{k}$. Let \beta be a basis of V.

In this case we can write

V\cong \mathbf{k}^{\oplus \beta}:=\bigl\{ f\colon\beta\to \mathbf{k}\bigm| f(\mathbf{b})=\mathbf{0}\text{ for all but finitely many }\mathbf{b}\in\beta\bigr\}.<br />

Q:Show that card(V) = card(\mathbf{k}) card(\beta)
Can anyone help?:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let

V_n=\{f:\beta\rightarrow k~|~f(b)=0~\text{except for possibly n values of b}\}

It is clear that |V_n|=|\beta||k|. Then

V\cong \bigcup_{n\in \mathbb{N}}{V_n}. Thus |V|=|\beta||k|...
 
micromass said:
It is clear that |V_n|=|\beta||k|.

Thank you for your quick reply, but how is that clear?
 
Well, it isn't that clear, but you should think about it. The following would probably make it easier:

Take V1. Then to construct a map in V1, then you just need to select an element b in \beta and x in k. Then the map is defined by f(b)=x and all other elements map to 0. Thus |V_1|=|k||\beta|.

Take V2. Then to construct a map in V2, then you just need to select elements b, b' in \beta and x,y in k. Then define a map by f(b)=x and f(b')=y and all other elements map to 0. Thus |V_2|=|k|^2|\beta|^2=|k||\beta| since k is infinite.

The same happens with the other Vn...
 
I see. It's clear now. Thank you.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top