Cardinality of an interval as a limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the Lebesgue measure of an interval \( |I| \) is the limit as \( n \) approaches infinity of \( \frac{1}{n}|(IA_{n})| \), where \( IA_{n} \) denotes the intersection of the interval \( I \) with the set \( A_{n} = \{ k/n \mid k \in \mathbb{Z} \} \). The analysis clarifies that for bounded intervals, the cardinality \( |I \cap A_n| \) can be bounded between \( nb - na - 3 \) and \( nb - na + 1 \). This leads to the conclusion that \( \lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{|IA_n|}{n} = |I| \) as \( n \) increases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lebesgue measure and cardinality in set theory.
  • Familiarity with intervals in real analysis, specifically bounded and unbounded intervals.
  • Knowledge of sequences and limits in mathematical analysis.
  • Basic understanding of rational numbers and their representation as fractions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lebesgue measure in detail, focusing on its properties and applications.
  • Explore the concept of cardinality in set theory, particularly in relation to infinite sets.
  • Investigate the behavior of sequences and limits, especially in the context of real analysis.
  • Learn about different types of intervals and their implications in mathematical proofs.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the relationship between cardinality and Lebesgue measure in the context of intervals.

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Let $I$ be an interval and $A_{n}$ be the set of $k/n$ where $k$ is an integer.

Prove that $|I|$ is the limit as $n$ tends to infinity of $\frac{1}{n}|(IA_{n})|$ where $IA_{n}$ denotes intersection.

My plan was to split it up into cases for the different type of intervals and come up with formulas for $|(IA_{n})|$, but I'm finding that very tricky.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermat said:
Let $I$ be an interval and $A_{n}$ be the set of $k/n$ where $k$ is an integer.

Prove that $|I|$ is the limit as $n$ tends to infinity of $\frac{1}{n}|(IA_{n})|$ where $IA_{n}$ denotes intersection.

My plan was to split it up into cases for the different type of intervals and come up with formulas for $|(IA_{n})|$, but I'm finding that very tricky.

Thanks

Hi Fermat,

The stated problem is a bit unclear; you used the absolute value bars to indicate both cardinality and Lebesgue measure? I'm assuming that $|I|$ is the Lebesgue measure of $I$ and $|IA_n|$ is the cardinality of $I\cap A_n$ (with the exception that |IA_n| is $\infty$ if $I\cap A_n$ is infinte). If $I$ is an unbounded interval, $|I| = \infty$ and $|I\cap A_n| = \infty$. So the equation will hold. So suppose $I$ is a bounded interval. There are four possible forms for $I$: $(a,b)$, $[a,b)$, $(a,b]$, and $[a,b]$. I'll do the case when $I = [a,b]$, as the others have similar arguments. When $I = [a,b]$, $|I \cap A_n|$ is no more than $nb - na + 1$ and no less than $nb - na - 3$. Hence, $||I \cap A_n| - (nb - na)| < C$ for some constant $C$ independent of $n$. Thus,

$$ \left|\frac{|IA_n|}{n} - |I|\right| < \frac{C}{n}.$$

Since $\frac{C}{n} \to 0$ as $n \to \infty$, we deduce that

$$ \lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{|IA_n|}{n} = |I|$$.
 
Last edited:
Euge said:
Hi Fermat,

The stated problem is a bit unclear; you used the absolute value bars to indicate both cardinality and Lebesgue measure? I'm assuming that $|I|$ is the Lebesgue measure of $I$ and $|IA_n|$ is the cardinality of $I\cap A_n$. If $I$ is an unbounded interval, $|I| = \infty$ and $|I\cap A_n| = \infty$. So the equation will hold. So suppose $I$ is a bounded interval. There are four possible forms for $I$: $(a,b)$, $[a,b)$, $(a,b]$, and $[a,b]$. I'll do the case when $I = [a,b]$, as the others have similar arguments. When $I = [a,b]$, $I \cap A_n$ has no more than $nb - na + 1$ elements and no less than $nb - na - 3$ elements. Hence, $||I \cap A_n| - (nb - na)| < C$ for some constant $C$ independent of $n$. Thus,

$$ \left|\frac{|IA_n|}{n} - |I|\right| < \frac{C}{n}.$$

Since $\frac{C}{n} \to 0$ as $n \to \infty$, we deduce that

$$ \lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{|IA_n|}{n} = |I|$$.

Thanks very much. Can I ask how you got the bounds $nb - na + 1$ and $nb - na - 3$, and how I obtain bounds for the other sorts of intervals. Thanks
 
Fermat said:
Thanks very much. Can I ask how you got the bounds $nb - na + 1$ and $nb - na - 3$, and how I obtain bounds for the other sorts of intervals. Thanks

When $I = [a, b]$, $I\cap A_n$ is the set of rationals of the form $\frac{k}{n}$ which satisfy $a \le \frac{k}{n} \le b$, i.e., $na \le k \le nb$. So $|I \cap A_n|$ is the number of integers $k$ in the interval $[na,nb]$. The least integer in $[na,nb]$ is either $na$ or $\lfloor na \rfloor + 1$ (depending on whether or not $na$ is an integer) and similarly the greatest integer in $[na,nb]$ is either $nb$ or $\lfloor nb \rfloor - 1$. Hence $|I \cap A_n|$ is either $nb - na + 1$, $\lfloor nb \rfloor - na$, $nb - \lfloor na \rfloor$, or $\lfloor nb \rfloor - \lfloor na \rfloor - 2$. Each of these numbers are between $nb - na - 3$ and $nb - na + 1$ since $\lfloor nb \rfloor \in (nb - 1, nb]$ and $\lfloor na \rfloor \in (na - 1, na]$. Therefore $|I \cap A_n|$ is no more than $nb - na + 1$ than $nb - na + 3$.

The other cases are dealt with in nearly the same way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K