Cardinality of an interval as a limit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the cardinality of an interval as a limit, specifically examining the relationship between the Lebesgue measure of an interval and the cardinality of the intersection of that interval with a set of rational numbers defined by the form $k/n$. Participants explore various cases of intervals and seek to establish bounds for the cardinality of these intersections.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that $|I|$ represents the Lebesgue measure of the interval $I$, while $|IA_n|$ denotes the cardinality of the intersection $I \cap A_n$.
  • It is noted that if $I$ is unbounded, both $|I|$ and $|I \cap A_n|$ are infinite, which leads to a straightforward conclusion.
  • For bounded intervals, participants identify four possible forms of $I$: $(a,b)$, $[a,b)$, $(a,b]$, and $[a,b]$, and discuss the case when $I = [a,b]$ in detail.
  • One participant provides bounds for $|I \cap A_n|$, stating it is no more than $nb - na + 1$ and no less than $nb - na - 3$, and discusses the implications of these bounds.
  • Another participant questions how these bounds were derived and seeks clarification on obtaining bounds for other types of intervals.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the integers $k$ that satisfy the conditions for the intersection $I \cap A_n$, including considerations of whether $na$ and $nb$ are integers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express some agreement on the interpretation of the problem and the bounds for the case of the closed interval $[a,b]$. However, there remains uncertainty regarding the derivation of bounds for other types of intervals, indicating that the discussion is not fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential ambiguity in the notation used for cardinality and Lebesgue measure, which may affect the clarity of the discussion. Additionally, the bounds provided depend on the specific forms of the intervals being considered.

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Let $I$ be an interval and $A_{n}$ be the set of $k/n$ where $k$ is an integer.

Prove that $|I|$ is the limit as $n$ tends to infinity of $\frac{1}{n}|(IA_{n})|$ where $IA_{n}$ denotes intersection.

My plan was to split it up into cases for the different type of intervals and come up with formulas for $|(IA_{n})|$, but I'm finding that very tricky.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermat said:
Let $I$ be an interval and $A_{n}$ be the set of $k/n$ where $k$ is an integer.

Prove that $|I|$ is the limit as $n$ tends to infinity of $\frac{1}{n}|(IA_{n})|$ where $IA_{n}$ denotes intersection.

My plan was to split it up into cases for the different type of intervals and come up with formulas for $|(IA_{n})|$, but I'm finding that very tricky.

Thanks

Hi Fermat,

The stated problem is a bit unclear; you used the absolute value bars to indicate both cardinality and Lebesgue measure? I'm assuming that $|I|$ is the Lebesgue measure of $I$ and $|IA_n|$ is the cardinality of $I\cap A_n$ (with the exception that |IA_n| is $\infty$ if $I\cap A_n$ is infinte). If $I$ is an unbounded interval, $|I| = \infty$ and $|I\cap A_n| = \infty$. So the equation will hold. So suppose $I$ is a bounded interval. There are four possible forms for $I$: $(a,b)$, $[a,b)$, $(a,b]$, and $[a,b]$. I'll do the case when $I = [a,b]$, as the others have similar arguments. When $I = [a,b]$, $|I \cap A_n|$ is no more than $nb - na + 1$ and no less than $nb - na - 3$. Hence, $||I \cap A_n| - (nb - na)| < C$ for some constant $C$ independent of $n$. Thus,

$$ \left|\frac{|IA_n|}{n} - |I|\right| < \frac{C}{n}.$$

Since $\frac{C}{n} \to 0$ as $n \to \infty$, we deduce that

$$ \lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{|IA_n|}{n} = |I|$$.
 
Last edited:
Euge said:
Hi Fermat,

The stated problem is a bit unclear; you used the absolute value bars to indicate both cardinality and Lebesgue measure? I'm assuming that $|I|$ is the Lebesgue measure of $I$ and $|IA_n|$ is the cardinality of $I\cap A_n$. If $I$ is an unbounded interval, $|I| = \infty$ and $|I\cap A_n| = \infty$. So the equation will hold. So suppose $I$ is a bounded interval. There are four possible forms for $I$: $(a,b)$, $[a,b)$, $(a,b]$, and $[a,b]$. I'll do the case when $I = [a,b]$, as the others have similar arguments. When $I = [a,b]$, $I \cap A_n$ has no more than $nb - na + 1$ elements and no less than $nb - na - 3$ elements. Hence, $||I \cap A_n| - (nb - na)| < C$ for some constant $C$ independent of $n$. Thus,

$$ \left|\frac{|IA_n|}{n} - |I|\right| < \frac{C}{n}.$$

Since $\frac{C}{n} \to 0$ as $n \to \infty$, we deduce that

$$ \lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{|IA_n|}{n} = |I|$$.

Thanks very much. Can I ask how you got the bounds $nb - na + 1$ and $nb - na - 3$, and how I obtain bounds for the other sorts of intervals. Thanks
 
Fermat said:
Thanks very much. Can I ask how you got the bounds $nb - na + 1$ and $nb - na - 3$, and how I obtain bounds for the other sorts of intervals. Thanks

When $I = [a, b]$, $I\cap A_n$ is the set of rationals of the form $\frac{k}{n}$ which satisfy $a \le \frac{k}{n} \le b$, i.e., $na \le k \le nb$. So $|I \cap A_n|$ is the number of integers $k$ in the interval $[na,nb]$. The least integer in $[na,nb]$ is either $na$ or $\lfloor na \rfloor + 1$ (depending on whether or not $na$ is an integer) and similarly the greatest integer in $[na,nb]$ is either $nb$ or $\lfloor nb \rfloor - 1$. Hence $|I \cap A_n|$ is either $nb - na + 1$, $\lfloor nb \rfloor - na$, $nb - \lfloor na \rfloor$, or $\lfloor nb \rfloor - \lfloor na \rfloor - 2$. Each of these numbers are between $nb - na - 3$ and $nb - na + 1$ since $\lfloor nb \rfloor \in (nb - 1, nb]$ and $\lfloor na \rfloor \in (na - 1, na]$. Therefore $|I \cap A_n|$ is no more than $nb - na + 1$ than $nb - na + 3$.

The other cases are dealt with in nearly the same way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K