Cartesian Equation for Parametrized Curve: Find Solution

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Cartesian equations for parametrized curves, specifically for the curves defined by \( r(t) = (\cos^2 t, \sin^2 t) \) and \( r(t) = (e^t, t^2) \). The participants confirm that the first curve satisfies the equation \( x + y = 1 \) with the constraints \( 0 \leq x \leq 1 \) and \( 0 \leq y \leq 1 \). For the second curve, they establish that \( y = (\ln x)^2 \) for \( x > 0 \) and \( y \geq 0 \), confirming the relationships between the variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametrized curves
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities, specifically \( \cos^2 t + \sin^2 t = 1 \)
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of inequalities and their implications in Cartesian coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of surjectivity in parametrized curves
  • Learn about the properties of logarithmic functions in relation to Cartesian equations
  • Investigate other examples of parametrized curves and their Cartesian forms
  • Study the concept of bounds in the context of Cartesian equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or analytical geometry, and anyone interested in understanding the conversion of parametrized curves to Cartesian equations.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to find the cartesian equation of the following parametrized curve:

$$r(t)=(\cos^2 t, \sin^2 t)$$

I have tried the following:

Since $\cos^2 t+ \sin^2 t=1, \forall t$, the coordinates $x= \cos^2 t, y= \sin^2 t$ of $r(t)$ satisfy $x+y=1$.

Is the above sufficient or is a reverse implication needed? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

I want to find the cartesian equation of the following parametrized curve:

$$r(t)=(\cos^2 t, \sin^2 t)$$

I have tried the following:

Since $\cos^2 t+ \sin^2 t=1, \forall t$, the coordinates $x= \cos^2 t, y= \sin^2 t$ of $r(t)$ satisfy $x+y=1$.

Is the above sufficient or is a reverse implication needed? (Thinking)

Hey evinda! (Smile)

Indeed, something more is needed.
Let's just consider what the ranges of $\cos^2 t$ and $\sin^2 t$ are...
Are they surjective on $\mathbb R$? (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Hey evinda! (Smile)

Indeed, something more is needed.
Let's just consider what the ranges of $\cos^2 t$ and $\sin^2 t$ are...
Are they surjective on $\mathbb R$? (Thinking)

They are surjective from $\mathbb{R}$ to $[0,1]$, right?
 
evinda said:
They are surjective from $\mathbb{R}$ to $[0,1]$, right?

Yep.
So perhaps we should set some bounds on the curve defined by $x+y=1$. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep.
So perhaps we should set some bounds on the curve defined by $x+y=1$. (Thinking)

Don't we have to pick these restrictions? (Thinking)

$$0 \leq x \leq 1 \\ 0 \leq y \leq 1$$
 
evinda said:
Don't we have to pick these restrictions? (Thinking)

$$0 \leq x \leq 1 \\ 0 \leq y \leq 1$$

Yep. (Happy)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. (Happy)

So can we say the following?

Since $\cos^2 t+ \sin^2 t=1, \forall t$, the coordinates $x= \cos^2 t, y= \sin^2 t$ of $r(t)$ satisfy $x+y=1$ with $0 \leq x \leq 1, 0 \leq y \leq 1$.

- - - Updated - - -

So if we want to find the cartesian equation of $r(t)=(e^t, t^2)$ can we say the following?

Since $t^2= (\ln e^t)^2 , \forall t$, the coordinates $x=e^t, y=t^2$ satisfy $y=(\ln x)^2$ for $x >0 , y \geq 0$.
 
evinda said:
So can we say the following?

Since $\cos^2 t+ \sin^2 t=1, \forall t$, the coordinates $x= \cos^2 t, y= \sin^2 t$ of $r(t)$ satisfy $x+y=1$ with $0 \leq x \leq 1, 0 \leq y \leq 1$.

- - - Updated - - -

So if we want to find the cartesian equation of $r(t)=(e^t, t^2)$ can we say the following?

Since $t^2= (\ln e^t)^2 , \forall t$, the coordinates $x=e^t, y=t^2$ satisfy $y=(\ln x)^2$ for $x >0 , y \geq 0$.

Seems fine to me. (Smile)
 
I like Serena said:
Seems fine to me. (Smile)

Nice... Thanks a lot! (Smirk)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K