MHB Cartesian Equation for Parametrized Curve: Find Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the Cartesian equation for the parametrized curve defined by r(t) = (cos²t, sin²t). Participants confirm that the equation x + y = 1 holds true, but additional constraints are necessary, specifically 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ y ≤ 1, since the ranges of cos²t and sin²t are limited to [0, 1]. The conversation also transitions to another curve, r(t) = (e^t, t²), where it is established that y = (ln x)² for x > 0 and y ≥ 0. The participants agree on the sufficiency of these findings for both curves. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of defining bounds when converting parametrized equations to Cartesian form.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to find the cartesian equation of the following parametrized curve:

$$r(t)=(\cos^2 t, \sin^2 t)$$

I have tried the following:

Since $\cos^2 t+ \sin^2 t=1, \forall t$, the coordinates $x= \cos^2 t, y= \sin^2 t$ of $r(t)$ satisfy $x+y=1$.

Is the above sufficient or is a reverse implication needed? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

I want to find the cartesian equation of the following parametrized curve:

$$r(t)=(\cos^2 t, \sin^2 t)$$

I have tried the following:

Since $\cos^2 t+ \sin^2 t=1, \forall t$, the coordinates $x= \cos^2 t, y= \sin^2 t$ of $r(t)$ satisfy $x+y=1$.

Is the above sufficient or is a reverse implication needed? (Thinking)

Hey evinda! (Smile)

Indeed, something more is needed.
Let's just consider what the ranges of $\cos^2 t$ and $\sin^2 t$ are...
Are they surjective on $\mathbb R$? (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Hey evinda! (Smile)

Indeed, something more is needed.
Let's just consider what the ranges of $\cos^2 t$ and $\sin^2 t$ are...
Are they surjective on $\mathbb R$? (Thinking)

They are surjective from $\mathbb{R}$ to $[0,1]$, right?
 
evinda said:
They are surjective from $\mathbb{R}$ to $[0,1]$, right?

Yep.
So perhaps we should set some bounds on the curve defined by $x+y=1$. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep.
So perhaps we should set some bounds on the curve defined by $x+y=1$. (Thinking)

Don't we have to pick these restrictions? (Thinking)

$$0 \leq x \leq 1 \\ 0 \leq y \leq 1$$
 
evinda said:
Don't we have to pick these restrictions? (Thinking)

$$0 \leq x \leq 1 \\ 0 \leq y \leq 1$$

Yep. (Happy)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. (Happy)

So can we say the following?

Since $\cos^2 t+ \sin^2 t=1, \forall t$, the coordinates $x= \cos^2 t, y= \sin^2 t$ of $r(t)$ satisfy $x+y=1$ with $0 \leq x \leq 1, 0 \leq y \leq 1$.

- - - Updated - - -

So if we want to find the cartesian equation of $r(t)=(e^t, t^2)$ can we say the following?

Since $t^2= (\ln e^t)^2 , \forall t$, the coordinates $x=e^t, y=t^2$ satisfy $y=(\ln x)^2$ for $x >0 , y \geq 0$.
 
evinda said:
So can we say the following?

Since $\cos^2 t+ \sin^2 t=1, \forall t$, the coordinates $x= \cos^2 t, y= \sin^2 t$ of $r(t)$ satisfy $x+y=1$ with $0 \leq x \leq 1, 0 \leq y \leq 1$.

- - - Updated - - -

So if we want to find the cartesian equation of $r(t)=(e^t, t^2)$ can we say the following?

Since $t^2= (\ln e^t)^2 , \forall t$, the coordinates $x=e^t, y=t^2$ satisfy $y=(\ln x)^2$ for $x >0 , y \geq 0$.

Seems fine to me. (Smile)
 
I like Serena said:
Seems fine to me. (Smile)

Nice... Thanks a lot! (Smirk)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K