Cascaded low-pass filter followed by a buffer amplifier

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of a cascaded low-pass filter followed by a buffer amplifier. The transfer function is defined as \(\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\left(\frac{1}{1+j\frac{{\omega}}{{\omega}_C}}\right)^4\), where \(\omega_C\) is the cutoff frequency calculated as \(f_c=\frac{1}{2\pi RC}\), yielding a value of 1.59 kHz for R = 10 kΩ and C = 10 nF. The overall gain of the cascaded system is determined to be positive +1, and the phase shift for the entire system is calculated as \((-arctan(2\pi f RC)) \times 4\). The discussion also clarifies that the buffers prevent loading effects between stages.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transfer functions in control systems
  • Knowledge of RC low-pass filter design
  • Familiarity with buffer amplifiers and their characteristics
  • Basic concepts of phase shift in cascaded systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of transfer functions in signal processing
  • Learn about the design and analysis of nth-order low-pass filters
  • Explore the characteristics and applications of operational amplifiers (op-amps)
  • Investigate the effects of cascading multiple filter stages on overall system performance
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying signal processing, and professionals designing analog filters and amplifiers will benefit from this discussion.

topcat123
Messages
77
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


3. FIGURE 3(a) shows a simple low-pass filter followed by a buffer
amplifier.
(a) Write down the transfer function for the filter.
(b) Determine the 3db frequency (fc) if R = 10 kΩ and C = 10 nF.
(c) If four such stages are cascaded as shown in FIGURE 3(b),
determine the gain and phase of the overall transfer function at
(i) 0.1fc
(ii) 10fc.

Homework Equations


The Transfer function
\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\frac{-1}{1+j\frac{{\omega}}{{\omega}_c}}
The natural frequency at -3dB
f_c=\frac{1}{2{\pi}RC}

The Attempt at a Solution


a) as above the transfer function
b)f_c=\frac{1}{2{\pi}RC}=\frac{1}{2{\pi}10000*10*10^{-9}}=1.59KHz

c) I am a bit stuck with this one

I know
The resulting RC filter circuit would be known as an “nth-order” filter with a roll-off slope of “n x -20dB/decade”.
So the roll off of this 4th order filter would be -80dB
The phase shift for a single low pass filter is-arctan(2{\pi}fRC)=-arctan(\frac{f}{f_c})I am asuming that the phase shifts of all 4 can be added?

All help is apreciated
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Fig 3(a).JPG
    Fig 3(a).JPG
    5.8 KB · Views: 714
  • Fig 3(b).JPG
    Fig 3(b).JPG
    9.6 KB · Views: 688
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you expect a NEGATIVE transfer function?`The buffer provides a gain of "+1", does it not?
 
Check the buffer stage. What's its gain?

Yes, with the buffer amplifier in place the phase shifts can simply be added.Edit: Oops! LvW got there ahead of me!
 
I figured it would have -ve feedback as the output feeds back into the inverting input.

how do I workout the overall gain with the -80 dB roll off?
 
topcat123 said:
I figured it would have -ve feedback as the output feeds back into the inverting input.
What are the "rules" for the ideal op-amp?
how do I workout the overall gain with the -80 dB roll off?
The stage are cascaded. Thanks to the buffers they don't load each other or affect each other's individual transfer functions. So each transfer function applies, one at a time, as you pass from one to the next...
 
gneill said:
What are the "rules" for the ideal op-amp?

am ideal op-amp will have infinite input impedance infinite gain and zero output impedance.

gneill said:
So each transfer function applies, one at a time, as you pass from one to the next

so the output of the first becomes the input to the second and so on?

thanks
 
topcat123 said:
am ideal op-amp will have infinite input impedance infinite gain and zero output impedance.
Yes, and as a consequence what is the rule of thumb for the potential difference between the inputs (when negative feedback is present)?
so the output of the first becomes the input to the second and so on?
Yes.
 
gneill said:
Yes, and as a consequence what is the rule of thumb for the potential difference between the inputs (when negative feedback is present)?

As the feed back is negative and at unity then 0V potential difference.
But I believe there is actual a small amount. Because the gain is large this small difference is amplified so the output become almost equal to non-inverting input voltage at a point of equilibrium.
 
topcat123 said:
As the feed back is negative and at unity then 0V potential difference.
But I believe there is actual a small amount. Because the gain is large this small difference is amplified so the output become almost equal to non-inverting input voltage at a point of equilibrium.
Okay. So then, taking that into consideration, is the gain of the stage positive or negative?
 
  • #10
gneill said:
Okay. So then, taking that into consideration, is the gain of the stage positive or negative?

Ah I get it the gain is clearly positive +1 and so must the TF
And the feedback is negative.

Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gneill
  • #11
so as far as I figure the TF will be \frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\left(\frac{1}{1+j\frac{{\omega}}{{\omega}_C}}\right)^4

And the phase shift is (-arctan(2{\pi}fRC))*4
 
Last edited:
  • #12
That looks reasonable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topcat123

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
792
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K