A Cavity locking using Lockin+PID technique

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hashirama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cavity Pid
Hashirama
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
In summary I am trying to lock the cavity using the modulation demodulation technique, but I need help with the signals I am getting.
Hello, So I am trying to lock an X cavity to a 1064 nm laser. Laser has a linewidth of ~100KHz, cavity linewidth is 37.65KHz, and the FSR is 3.125 MHz. When I try to scan the cavity, the peaks usually shift and after a few seconds, the resonance comes off. I am scanning the cavity at around 100 Hz, and I assume it has some high-frequency noise that contributes to the jitter.
To lock, I am using Lock In+PID method, but with very slow modulation (20-30 KHz), my piezo where I am sending the modulation (attached to one of the cavity mirrors) can go up to 340KHz.

In the scanning image, the lock-in output is in green, the scanned peaks are in yellow. In PID image, blue one is error monitor and green is the output, I am not sure I am using it correctly.
When I use the modulated signal, the lock-in output behaves strangely, like at the peaks, it gives some signal, but whether it is the derivative or not cant be said. Same when it goes to PID.

I am attaching some pictures of what I got. Can someone please help me identify if it is right?

Thanks a lot!
 

Attachments

  • Modulated.jpg
    Modulated.jpg
    61.3 KB · Views: 86
  • PID when scanning(feedback is not connected).jpg
    PID when scanning(feedback is not connected).jpg
    38.2 KB · Views: 56
  • Scanning.jpg
    Scanning.jpg
    69.9 KB · Views: 65
Physics news on Phys.org
berkeman said:
Hello, Greetings.
I have another question. If the cavity is locked at a certain point, What should I see as the cavity transmission from the photodiode? A "constant" voltage signal or the peaks? (While the ramp is off)

I think I managed to do it decently up to the error signal; I am attaching a picture of it.

Blue: cavity transmission, Green: Error from lock-in, yellow: error monitor from pid, setpoint as zero V.
 

Attachments

  • 20240420_170227.jpg
    20240420_170227.jpg
    76.2 KB · Views: 67
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
56
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top