Center of gravity of an orbitting body not at center of gravity

AI Thread Summary
In a low orbit near a neutron star, the gravitational field causes a significant displacement of an object's center of gravity, leading to extreme forces that would be lethal. At 1 meter from a neutron star, the gravitational difference results in a center of gravity shift of about 1/100,000th of a meter, while a black hole at 10 meters away would cause a 10-centimeter displacement. The strength of this gravitational effect diminishes with distance, following an inverse square law, but the overall impact is related to the inverse fourth power. This gravitational variation may contribute to tidal locking, as the differences in gravitational attraction create oscillatory energy exchanges between orbital and rotational forms. Additionally, the phenomenon can affect microgravity conditions within orbiting spacecraft and influence fluid behavior on celestial bodies.
Pds3.14
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
It just occurred to me that in the right gravitational field, say, in a low orbit 100 km from the core of a neutron star with a mass equal to that of the sun, an orbiting object's center of gravity is somewhat noticeably displaced from its center of mass. Specifically, 1 meter closer to the neutron star, there is about a 1.03 km/s^2 stronger gravity, obviously, this is a ludicrous amount of force that would quite like kill anyone at that altitude (if radiation and heat hadn't done that already). With a field strength variation that high (1030 square hertz) compared to the gravity of 51520 km/s^2. The gravity on a 1-meter dumbbell facing the neutron star will move the center of mass by about 1/100000th of a meter.
Or a more powerful example using low orbit of a black hole generating 1 G 10 meters away.
At 10 meters away, the variation is roughly 2 square hertz, so you would be fairly okay in terms of not being turned into spaghetti, but the previous dumbbell, or roughly speaking, a person, would experience roughly a 10 centimeter displacement in center-of gravity away from center off mass. This is all at non-relativistic speeds of about 10 m/s orbital velocity and non-relativistic gravity of 8-12 m/s^2.

Curiously, if I go out to 100 meters distant, the distance removed from the center of mass that the center of gravity is goes down by a factor of 100, e.g. It is proportional to the inverse square. However, the overall strength of the effect is therefore clearly associated with the inverse fourth power.
Which, taken to its logical extreme, means that at 1 meter, with a gravity of 100 G and a variation of 2 kilohertz/second (YAY for unit cancelation), this force would push the center of G 10/11ths of the way toward the hole. What effects does this have in real life, is it partially responsible for tidal locking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even in real life, the microgravity inside an orbiting spacecraft can be detected and will affect what objects will do inside it. The effect when bigger masses are involved will be correspondingly greater.

Tidal locking has to involve some loss mechainsm, I believe. Without friction effects, the mutual steady slowing down and speeding up of the two bodies would become oscillatory, energy passing back and forth between orbital and rotational forms. The tide, of course, happens because of the difference in gravitational attraction from place to place. There is an equivalent to 'spaghettification' with the atmospheres of small planets in orbit near to stars, when the higher velocity molecules happen to 'escape' up/down into the star when they reach the null between the two bodies.
 
If you had a fluid on the object, it would slosh around.
If you stood on it, it would feel like it was wobbling.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top