Center of Mass of open top cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the center of mass of a hollow cylindrical shell with a solid bottom and an open top, defined by its radius R and height h. The original poster attempts to calculate the center of mass using a formula that incorporates the dimensions and mass distribution of the cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the missing top on the center of mass and question how to account for the mass of the top piece. There are discussions about the center of mass of the top piece alone and whether the masses would cancel out in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical expressions and attempting to clarify the calculations involved. Some have pointed out potential errors in the simplification of expressions, while others are questioning the correctness of the initial setup and assumptions. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the dialogue is fostering a deeper examination of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem as posed, including the specific configuration of the cylinder and the requirement to use "pi" for π. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the algebraic manipulation of the expressions involved.

naianator
Messages
48
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The attached diagram shows a uniform density hollow cylindrical shell with a solid bottom and an open top. It has radius R and height h.

Find the height for the center of mass of this cylinder, taking the origin of the coordinate system at the center of the bottom. Use "pi" for π.

Homework Equations


x_cm=m_1x_1+m_2x_2+m_3x_3/m_1+m_2+m_3

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not even really sure how to start but I tried this

If the top wasn't missing then the cylinder would have a center of mass at h/2 and the missing top has a center of mass at h so

CM = (h/2*(2*pi*R*h+2*pi*R^2)-h*pi*R^2)/2*pi*R*h+2*pi*R^2-pi*R^2

= pi*R*h^2/2*pi*R*h-pi*R^2
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-07-25 at 1.14.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-07-25 at 1.14.07 PM.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 747
Physics news on Phys.org
If you had just the top piece located at height h, could you determine the center of its mass?
 
Borg said:
If you had just the top piece located at height h, could you determine the center of its mass?
Wouldn't it just be h?
 
naianator said:
Wouldn't it just be h?
And can you determine the mass of it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: naianator
Borg said:
And can you determine the mass of it?
Wouldn't the masses cancel though? h = h*m/m?
 
naianator said:
CM = (h/2*(2*pi*R*h+2*pi*R^2)-h*pi*R^2)/2*pi*R*h+2*pi*R^2-pi*R^2

= pi*R*h^2/2*pi*R*h-pi*R^2
You really ought to parenthesise expressions correctly. You mean
(h/2*(2*pi*R*h+2*pi*R^2)-h*pi*R^2)/(2*pi*R*h+2*pi*R^2-pi*R^2)
or in LaTex
##\frac{\frac h2(2\pi Rh+2\pi R^2)-h\pi R^2}{2\pi Rh+2\pi R^2-\pi R^2}##
But you made a mistake in simplifying to
##\frac{\pi Rh^2}{2\pi R h-\pi R^2}##
(Note that that would make it > h/2.)
 
haruspex said:
You really ought to parenthesise expressions correctly. You mean
(h/2*(2*pi*R*h+2*pi*R^2)-h*pi*R^2)/(2*pi*R*h+2*pi*R^2-pi*R^2)
or in LaTex
##\frac{\frac h2(2\pi Rh+2\pi R^2)-h\pi R^2}{2\pi Rh+2\pi R^2-\pi R^2}##
But you made a mistake in simplifying to
##\frac{\pi Rh^2}{2\pi R h-\pi R^2}##
(Note that that would make it > h/2.)
I'm having trouble finding where the mistake is. Is the first expression correct?
 
naianator said:
I'm having trouble finding where the mistake is. Is the first expression correct?
Yes, it's just the last line that's wrong. Check the signs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: naianator
haruspex said:
Yes, it's just the last line that's wrong. Check the signs.
Ahhh yes! Thank you
 
  • #10
naianator said:
If the top wasn't missing then the cylinder would have a center of mass at h/2 and the missing top has a center of mass at h so
Rather than that:

If both the top and bottom were missing, then the CM would be at h/2.

To this add in the bottom, which has CM at 0 .

It makes the algebra a bit easier.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: naianator

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K