Centrifical Motion Theoretical Question

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving an equation that relates the period of a ball in circular motion (T) to the length of the string (L) and the radius of the circle (R), without incorporating angles. The participant initially resolved the tension (Ft) into its x and y components but faced challenges in incorporating L into the equation without using angles. They realized that by breaking down the vertical component of tension, they could express it in terms of L and R without introducing angles. Ultimately, they found a solution by using the relationship between the components of tension and gravitational force. The discussion emphasizes the importance of resolving forces correctly to derive the necessary equation.
Retricide
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball of unknown mass is attached to a massless string. The string is then held at the opposite end and the ball is pushed, as to give it a centrifical motion (acceleration toward the center and perpendicular velocity). NOTE: The length of the string is not the radius (the string is the hypotenuse) and all angles are unknown.
The ball swings around a circle, of known radius, and period of rotation is measured 10 times and then divided by 10 to get an average period. The radius of the circle (R), length of the string (L), and period of ball (T) are known.

Derive an equation relating the period of the ball (T) to the length of the string (L) and radius of the circle (R).
There should be no angles in your final equation, since you will not be directly measuring angle.

I think you are allowed to use Ft (tension) in the equation (mass as well, but I think it should cancel out).


Homework Equations


Fnet=ma
a(centripetal)=(4∏^2R)/T^2



The Attempt at a Solution


Ft is in a different plane than acceleration, so I resolved Ft into component x and y vectors.
I solved Fty to equal mg
and Ftx to equal (m4∏^2R)/T^2.

However, I'm not sure where to go from here and how to incorporate L into the equation.
I know I can use arccos to get an angle from L and R, which would incorporate L into the equation, but that would mean I have an angle (arccos) in my equation, which, I cannot have.

Any ideas how to incorporate L into the equation relating T and R?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, I think I've got it actually.

I forgot to break Fty down into
Ftsin(arccos(L/r))=mg

Problem solved :3
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
912
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K