Centrifugal force and angular velocity

AI Thread Summary
Centrifugal force increases with radius when angular velocity is constant, leading to a greater force required to maintain circular motion. The formula F = m * r * ω² illustrates this relationship, where ω is the angular velocity. Conversely, if tangential velocity is constant, increasing radius results in decreased centrifugal force and a smaller angular velocity. The discussion clarifies that centrifugal force is a fictitious force in non-inertial frames, simplifying to F = m * (v²/r) under certain conditions. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the dynamics of rotational motion.
Lsos
Messages
803
Reaction score
9
According to the wikipedia page, when given an angular velocity, centrifugal force increases with radius. I always thought the larger the radius, the smaller the centrifugal force. I think I'm misunderstanding some term here (possibly "angular velocity"). Can someone please explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular velocity \omega is the rate at which angle changes with respect to time (revolutions per second, degrees per second, radians per second, etc). If this rate is a constant, then the larger your distance to the center r is, the larger the centrifugal force F you will feel.

F = m \;r\;\omega^{2}

However, if you are saying your tangential velocity v = r\;\omega is constant, then the farther out from the center you are, the smaller the centrifugal force you experience, but this also means your angular velocity is smaller too.

F = m \frac{v^{2}}{r}
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi Lsos! :smile:
Lsos said:
… given an angular velocity, centrifugal force increases with radius.

Yes, if the angular velocity is fixed, the larger the radius, the more force you need to keep something in the circle.

Loosely speaking, changing the velocity from v to -v in the same time is obviously a larger acceleration if v is larger! :wink:
I always thought the larger the radius, the smaller the centrifugal force. I think I'm misunderstanding some term here (possibly "angular velocity"). Can someone please explain?

Angular velocity is angle per second.

It's equal to revolutions per second times 2π. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi,
The centrifugal force is a fictitious force used in non-inertial reference frames. In general, it is given by $$ F_{\text{centrifugal}} = m\textbf{w} \times (\textbf{w}\times\textbf{r}). $$ Here, ## \textbf{w} ## is the angular velocity of the rotating reference frame and ## \textbf{r} ## is the position of the particle relative to the rotating frame's origin.

Usually it will simplify to jfizzix' answer (the first equation).

From a more qualitative perspective, imagine a large disc spinning. If you stand near the centre, you move in a small circle but not very fast. As you move out, you move faster and faster and you will find it more difficult to stay on the disc.

:)

PS: I used ##\textbf{w}## because for some reason the TeX code for omega isn't working... :\
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
quarkgazer said:
PS: I used ##\textbf{w}## because for some reason the TeX code for omega isn't working... :\
I think your use of the bold face text is the problem. Latex assumes what follows is text. You can use vectors like this$$ F_{centrifugal} = m\vec{\omega} \times (\vec{\omega} \times \vec{r}) $$

AM
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok...yeah. I think I get it. Seems like a very simple concept, but I just need to wrap my aging mind around this. Thanks everyone!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top