B Centrifugal Force in Angular SHM: Explained

AI Thread Summary
Centrifugal force (mv^2/r) does not act in angular simple harmonic motion (SHM) when considering small angular amplitudes, as the motion approximates a straight path. In scenarios with larger displacements, the bob experiences velocity and moves in a circular arc, resulting in an outward centrifugal force. However, in the context of SHM, only gravity and tension in the string are relevant forces, with tension providing the necessary centripetal force. The tension increases with larger displacements, similar to the g-forces felt on amusement rides. Ultimately, centrifugal force is not included in the free body diagram for small angular displacements in angular SHM.
Jon Drake
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Does centrifugal force (mv^2/r) act in any position of angular SHM? Please explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jon Drake said:
Does centrifugal force (mv^2/r) act in any position of angular SHM? Please explain.

You might need to explain your question! Can you give a bit more detail of the scenario you are asking about?
 
Suppose that a bob is suspended by a light string, and the position of the bob is somewhere between its mean and extreme position. Then it does have a velocity and it moves in a circular arc, so (mv^2/r) should act outward. At the same time in angular SHM we take very small angular amplitude, where the object moves almost in a straight path. In that case there is no centrifugal force. So, in a general situation, should we consider the centrifugal force in the free body diagram or not?
 
Jon Drake said:
Suppose that a bob is suspended by a light string, and the position of the bob is somewhere between its mean and extreme position. Then it does have a velocity and it moves in a circular arc, so (mv^2/r) should act outward. At the same time in angular SHM we take very small angular amplitude, where the object moves almost in a straight path. In that case there is no centrifugal force. So, in a general situation, should we consider the centrifugal force in the free body diagram or not?

There are only two forces: gravity and the tension in the string. The tension cancels out the force of gravity along the line of the string and provides the centripetal force. Gravity acts tangential to the motion.
 
Jon Drake said:
So, in a general situation, should we consider the centrifugal force in the free body diagram or not?
The force of the string on the bob is centripetal and that is the tension. For a big displacement, the tension will increase noticeably. Remember the g forces on fairground rides? You are 'pulling 3g' at the bottom of a rigid swing that starts off vertical. However, the SHM approximation only applies to small displacements because it is only then that the restoring force is (near enough) proportional to the displacement (which is the definition of SHM).
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top