Centripetal acceleration equation

AI Thread Summary
The centripetal acceleration equation, a = v^2/r, can seem non-intuitive, particularly regarding the relationship between speed and acceleration. It is important to note that "v" represents speed, not velocity, as velocity involves direction, which is constantly changing in circular motion. This change in direction at constant speed is what leads to acceleration, making the equation logical. Additionally, the radius affects the rate of change in direction: a longer radius results in slower changes and lower acceleration. Understanding these concepts clarifies the equation's validity and incorporates time through the speed measurement.
johndb
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I find the equation for centripetal acceleration non-intuititive. V^2/r tells me velocity is multiplied by the velocity ( which at this stage is usually a very large number) then this is divided by the radius.. Leaves me with subdivisions that happen to equal the rate of acceleration..Dubious.. And why like in linear acceleration is there no recognition of initial and final velocities and even a dimension of time. Is anyone else discomforted by this and can anyone shed some light on this, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The v in the equation is not velocity, it's speed. Even if this speed is constant, the velocity is constantly changing because the direction is constantly changing. It is this change in direction (in the case of constant speed) that constitutes the acceleration.

In that light, the situation is perfectly reasonable and intuitive. The faster you swing a weight on the end of a string, the more quickly it is changing direction, so the higher the acceleration. The longer the string, the slower the change in direction (at the same speed) and therefore the lower the acceleration

And time is in the equation, in v (as meters per second, for example).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top