Chain Rule for Quotients: Explained!

  • Thread starter Thread starter ziddy83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the chain rule and quotient rule to differentiate the function 1/(t^4 + 1)^3. The user initially questions whether to use the quotient rule or the chain rule, ultimately demonstrating both methods. The quotient rule yields the derivative as -12t^3/(t^4 + 1)^4, which is confirmed through the chain rule approach as well. It is noted that while both methods are valid, the chain rule may be quicker and less prone to errors. The conversation emphasizes the flexibility in choosing differentiation techniques based on personal preference and comfort.
ziddy83
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Hey what's up,
I had a question on the chain rule...How would I use the chain rule on a quotient...like if i have 1/(t^4 + 1)^3 , Would I use the quotient rule first, or just start with the chain rule?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok use the chain rule SO:

(bottom*d of top - top (d of bottom) )/bottom squared


wen u do all that u get (i may be wrong though)

-12t^3/(t^4 +1)^4
 
there are many rules u can use

like i used the quotient rule there
u can also solve it by using the prduct rule (WHICH I GOT WRONG ON THE TEST ERRR)
 
cool..thanks man.
 
Either one works.

Quotient rule:

f(t) = \frac{p(t)}{q(t)} = \frac{1}{(t^4 + 1)^3}
so
p(t) = 1
and
q(t) = (t^4+1)^3
which are both functions of t.

Alternatively, the chain rule:

f(t) = f(u(t)) = \frac{1}{u^3}
where u(t) = t^4 + 1

So we have

\frac{d}{dt}f(u(t)) = \frac{df}{du}\frac{du}{dt}
= \frac{d}{du}\left( u^{-3} \right) \frac{d}{dt}\left( t^4 + 1 \right) = (-3u^{-4})\cdot (4t^3) = \frac{-12t^3}{(t^4+1)^4}

I imagine the chain rule method is a bit faster, and I personally think I'd be more likely to make a silly mistake with the quotient rule, so.

--Justin
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top