Chain rule problem: proper method?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the chain rule in calculus to derive the formula for the derivative of cos(x). The user correctly applies the chain rule and identities to arrive at the result Dxcos(x) = -sin(x), but notes a discrepancy with the textbook's formula, which presents it as Dxcos(u) = -sin(u)Dx(u). The user seeks clarification on the proper notation and methodology when using multiple variables in derivatives, emphasizing the importance of context in mathematical expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the chain rule in calculus
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities
  • Knowledge of derivative notation (e.g., D, d/dx)
  • Basic proficiency in handling functions of multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule with multiple variables
  • Learn about trigonometric derivatives and their identities
  • Explore different notations for derivatives and their contexts
  • Practice problems involving derivatives of composite functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those learning about derivatives and the chain rule, as well as educators seeking to clarify notation and methodology in mathematical proofs.

stevensen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use the chain rule, the derivative formula Dxsinu=cosuDxu, together with the identities
cosx=sin([itex]\pi[/itex]/2 -x) and sinx=cos([itex]\pi[/itex]/2 -x)
to obtain the fomula for Dxcosx.


Homework Equations



Chain rule: dy/dx=dy/du[itex]\cdot[/itex]du/dx


The Attempt at a Solution



For my second attempt (the website made me log in again when I clicked on "Preview Post" last time - that seems to happen a lot):
Dxcosx=Dxsin([itex]\pi[/itex]/2 -x)
=cos([itex]\pi[/itex]/2 -x)(-1)
=-sinx

This is the result that I expected, but the formula in the textbook says Dxcosu=-sinuDxu. I realize that this formula contains "u"s and the required formula does not. I also realize that Dxx=1, which does account for the discrepancy between the answer that I got and the formula in the book, but I can't help wondering if it was by sheer happenstance that it turned out to work. I see no progression that could lead me to obtain the result that Dxcosx=-sinxDxx.

I'm not sure if I'm employing the chain rule properly. As you can see, I only used one variable in my proof, but the question uses both "u" and "x." Is there some form of notation that is considered correct for this kind of proof? (If so, I'd love to know why. There seem to be too many ways of expressing the same idea: dy/dx, d/dx, Dx, f'(x), others?) Thanks for your input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your derivative is correct, the only difference is the book leave it in a general form, for a general function u(x)

notation should go with the context of the problem, or how you learn it in class I guess, but all those you mention can mean the same thing. \

Generally if there's any chance of confusion I try and be as explicit as possible
[tex]\frac{dy(x)}{dx}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K