Chances of a catastrophic collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter kleinma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chances Collision
AI Thread Summary
A giant asteroid named "2003 QQ47" is projected to approach Earth with a collision probability of one in 909,000, with a potential impact date of March 21, 2014. Astronomers anticipate that the risk of impact will decrease as more data is collected in the coming months. Comparatively, asteroid "1950 DA" poses a higher risk with 300:1 odds for a collision in the year 2880. Discussions highlight the ongoing challenge of detecting near-Earth objects, as some could be on a collision course without prior detection. Overall, while the threat from "2003 QQ47" is minimal, the conversation underscores the importance of continuous monitoring of asteroids.
kleinma
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
{reposted CNN article edited down by Phobos...copyright laws, y'know}

LONDON, England (Reuters) -- A giant asteroid is heading for Earth and could hit in 2014...But for those fearing Armageddon, don't be alarmed -- the chances of a catastrophic collision are just one in 909,000. Asteroid "2003 QQ47" will be closely monitored over the next two months. Its potential strike date is March 21, 2014, but astronomers say that any risk of impact is likely to decrease as further data is gathered. On impact, it could have the effect of 20 million Hiroshima atomic bombs, ...
--------------------------------------------------------

seems like the odds are a lot better than some other near Earth asteroids..

From CNN
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Good job, Lincoln Near Earth Asteroid Research Program!

FWIW, here's the biggest known risk: asteroid 1950 DA has 300:1 odds for hitting the Earth...but in the year 2880.
 
Originally posted by Phobos
Good job, Lincoln Near Earth Asteroid Research Program!

FWIW, here's the biggest known risk: asteroid 1950 DA has 300:1 odds for hitting the Earth...but in the year 2880.

yeah i recall reading about that... of course like this one over time in its journey (especially one that far off) things can change.. just as this one says it will probably decrease to no change of impact after it gets closer and more data is observed... still pretty interesting...

i suppose an asteroid could be on course to hit us at any given time and we just haven't detected it yet right? depending on how fast it is traveling and its size..
 
Originally posted by kleinma
i suppose an asteroid could be on course to hit us at any given time and we just haven't detected it yet right? depending on how fast it is traveling and its size..
Yep. Happens a few times a year that we have a near miss with a continent killer and we don't detect them until they are already here or even past.
 
More

Two brief interviews:

Alan Hale, Ph.D., Astronomer and Director, Southwest Institute for Space Research, Cloudcroft, New Mexico:

Mark Boslough, Ph.D., Physicist and Principal Member, Technical Staff, Sandia National Laboratories, Computer modeling of climate, evolution and asteroid and comet impacts, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico:

http://www.earthfiles.com/news/news.cfm?ID=574&category=Science
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top