Change in Density due to Temperature and Pressure Change

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on estimating the percent change in density of solid iron under extreme conditions of 2000°C temperature and 5000 atm pressure. The bulk modulus of iron is established at 90×109 N/m2, and the volumetric expansion coefficient is 35×10-6 (°C)-1. The calculations reveal that the total change in volume is approximately 0.168495, leading to a percent change in density that can be derived from the combined effects of thermal expansion and pressure-induced volume change.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bulk modulus and its application in material science
  • Knowledge of volumetric expansion coefficients and their significance
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic principles related to pressure and temperature
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations and understanding relative changes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of temperature and pressure on other materials using their specific bulk moduli
  • Study the principles of thermal expansion in solids and liquids
  • Explore advanced thermodynamic equations related to phase changes in materials
  • Investigate real-world applications of density changes in geological and engineering contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in materials science, geophysics, and engineering who are interested in the behavior of materials under extreme conditions of temperature and pressure.

JSGandora
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Estimate the percent change in density of iron when it is still a solid, but deep in the Earth where the temperature is 2000^\circ C and it is under 5000 atm of pressure. Take into account both thermal expansion and changes due to increased outside pressure. Assume both the bulk modulus and the volume coefficient of expansion do not vary with temperature and are the same as at normal room temperature. The bulk modulus for iron is about 90\times10^9N/m^2.

We also know that the volumetric expansion coefficient of iron is 35\times10^{-6}(^{\circ}C)^{-1}.

Also, 1atm=1.103\times10^5N/m^2.

Homework Equations


\frac{\Delta V}{V_0}=-\frac{1}{B}\Delta P where B is the bulk modulus.
\Delta V=V_0\beta\Delta T where \beta is the volumetric expansion coefficient.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm assuming the change in volumes adds up so we have using the two equations successively, we have
\frac{\Delta V}{V_0}=\left(-\frac{1}{90\times10^9}\right)\left(5000atm\right) \left(\frac{1.103\times10^5N/m^2}{1atm}\right)=-0.00563
and
\frac{\Delta V}{V_0}=(4975^\circ C)(35\times10^-6\left(^\circ C\right)^{-1}=0.17413

So the total change in volume is 0.17413-0.00563=0.168495.

Then we could easily get the percent change in density. However, I am unsure if I am applying this correctly. Am I allowed to add the change in volumes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JSGandora said:
However, I am unsure if I am applying this correctly. Am I allowed to add the change in volumes?

The volume becomes (1+ΔV/V0) times the initial one in both processes, and you need to multiply them when there is change of volume both because of pressure and temperature. When ΔV/V0<<1, you can simply add the relative changes (with the proper signs) but 0.17 is not very small compared to unity. ehild
 
Wait, so it should be (0.17413)(-0.00563)=-0.0009803519? That doesn't make intuitive sense to me. Why do we multiply the change in volumes?
 
JSGandora said:
Wait, so it should be (0.17413)(-0.00563)=-0.0009803519?

NO. We multiply the volume ratios. V/V0=1.17413*(1-0.00563)=1.16752. ΔV/V0=0.16752.

ehild
 
Oh, I see now. Could you explain why it must be multiplied? I don't understand.
 
The formulae for volume change due to pressure and temperature refer to cases when the other quantity is constant. Pretend you put the piece of iron at high pressure first, when the volume decreases by Vo(ΔP/B). The new volume, V1=Vo(1-ΔP/B) is warmed up, and the new volume serves as "Vo" in thermal expansion. But the results are almost the same, and the the formulae are approximations anyway. So both ways should be accepted for the relative change of the volume, which is 0.168 with 3 significant digits by both methods.

ehild
 
Oh, thanks you so much. I understand now. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K