Change in gravitational potential energy for a slender

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the gravitational potential energy of a slender rod at an angle theta_0, it is essential to consider the varying distances each point on the rod has moved. The rod can be treated as a series of points uniformly distributed, allowing for an analytical approach to find the potential energy. The expression mg((0.6+0.2)/2)sin(theta_0) accurately represents the gravitational potential energy, where m is the mass of the rod. The discussion emphasizes the importance of a systematic analytical method rather than relying on intuition. Understanding the movement of the rod's mass center is crucial for accurate calculations.
zeralda21
Messages
119
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I'll provide a picture for a clearer view: http://i.imgur.com/wkXPcJn.jpg

Suppose that the slender rod starts at rest at theta = 0. For convenience we chose the datum at theta = 0.
Now I want to calculate the gravitational potential energy at a later instant when theta = theta_0. But it's tricky since some points of the rod have moved a distance (0.6+0.2)sin(theta_0) and some points have not moved at all. So how does one deal with this case? I have a solution but how should I do in the general case?

Just to be clear: I am looking for an analytical approach to it that does not involve some intuition because that can
be dangerous...

The Attempt at a Solution



Think of the slender rod as a huge amounts of points uniformly spread. For each point at one side of the mass center there is a point on the other side of the mass center so that the distance between these are the distance from O to the mass center. Hence it should be mg(0.6+0.2)sin(theta_0)/2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zeralda21 said:

Homework Statement



I'll provide a picture for a clearer view: http://i.imgur.com/wkXPcJn.jpg

Suppose that the slender starts at rest at theta = 0. For convenience we chose the datum at theta = 0.
Now I want to calculate the gravitational potential energy at a later instant when theta = theta_0. But it's tricky since some points of the slender have moved a distance (0.6+0.2)sin(theta_0) and some points have not moved at all. So how does one deal with this case? I have a solution but how should I do in the general case?

Just to be clear: I am looking for an analytical approach to it that does not involve some intuition because that can
be dangerous...

The Attempt at a Solution



Think of the slender as a huge amounts of points uniformly spread. For each point at one side of the mass center there is a point on the other side of the mass center so that the distance between these are the distance from O to the mass center. Hence it should be mg(0.6+0.2)sin(theta_0)/2
A slender what ?

The word slender is not a noun.
 
I am sorry. I thought slender and rod is the same thing. I mean a slender rod
 
Yes.

mg((0.6+0.2)/2)sin(θ0) is a valid expression for the gravitational potential energy of the rod.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top