Krushnaraj Pandya said:
So the temperature and internal energy changes when the train moves with a velocity or suddenly stops?? What's got me confused is that in a lot of places including the book 'Concepts of Physics by HC Verma' it says that since it is bulk motion of gas, there is no change in internal energy and therefore temperature change is zero. I read a similar conclusion on a previous forum answered by 'phinds' and 'haruspex' (I can't find the link right now). so which one to consider? Also, if the starting or stopping of train was gradual-would the temperature change be negligible as the inertial forces would be very small??
I suspect it depends on how sudden the change in speed is. If a moving box is gradually brought to rest then the gas exerts a greater pressure against the leading face than against the trailing, so does work on the box.
In the case of a sudden stop from velocity v it is clear that ½mv
2 gets added to the internal energy, where m is the mass of the gas.
We can run this in reverse, e.g. by using a frame of reference moving at velocity v. In this frame, the box is suddenly jerked from rest to moving at velocity v. The internal energy should be the same in both frames, therefore accelerating the box to velocity v added ½mv
2 to the internal energy and another ½mv
2 to the bulk KE. Thus, it takes more work to accelerate a box of gas than to accelerate the same mass of a solid.
This should not surprise. It is akin to an inelastic collision. We can simplify it to a single molecule bouncing back and forth parallel to the added velocity. If the box has mass M and the molecule mass m and we set the box moving at speed v then by conservation of momentum the bulk speed attained by the system is v' where (M+m)v'=Mv. The new KE is less than the original KE (½Mv
2) by ##\frac{Mmv^2}{2(M+m)}##. For M>>m this reduces to ½mv
2. Therefore the work done to accelerate the molecule was mv
2.
@Chestermiller , does that sound ok to you?