Change of sign on Green's functions (Maths problem)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of non-interacting Green functions in a model involving electron channels at zero temperature. The user initially encounters confusion regarding the sign change in the Green function when transitioning from a constant density of states to a Lorentzian form. They derive expressions for the Green function, noting that the limit taken as the density of states approaches infinity yields unexpected results. Ultimately, the user resolves their doubt, realizing that they misapplied the limit in their calculations. The thread concludes with the user stating that the issue is resolved and the discussion can be closed.
gonadas91
Messages
75
Reaction score
5
Hi, I am trying to solve a model where Non-interacting Green functions take part it. It has happened something that is spinning my head and I hope someone could help. The non interacting Green function for a chanel of electrons is:
G_{0}(\omega)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\epsilon\nu(\epsilon)\frac{1}{\omega - \epsilon + i\delta\text{sign($\omega$)}}
where I am integrating over the whole energy spectrum since I consider the chanel as a whole. I have to mention that I am at T=0 and \nu(\epsilon) is the density of states on the chanel. Ok, suppose we have a constant density of states. Then, the real part of the integral cancels (gives a cosntant part which is irrelevant) and the imaginary part, since \delta\to 0 becomes a delta function inside. Therefore:
G_{0}(\omega)=-i \nu\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\epsilon\delta(\omega - \epsilon)=-i\nu\text{$sign(Re(\omega))$}

We notice the dependence with the REAL part of the excitation energies \omega. Now, imagine that instead of a constant density of states, this density of states is a Lorentzian of the type:
\frac{\Lambda}{\Lambda^{2} + \epsilon^{2}}
Then the integral above can be completed in the complex plane using contour integration, and the result gives:
G_{0}(\omega)=\frac{\nu}{\frac{\omega}{\Lambda} + i\text{$sign(Im(\omega))$}} + \frac{i\nu\Lambda\text{$sign(Re(\omega))$}}{\Lambda^{2}+\omega^{2}}

Now, taking \Lambda\to\infty should gives us the result of the flat density of states but instead it gives the sign with the imaginary part! Someone can help on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok now doubt is solved I just did it at the end so this post can be closed ;)

It is just that I took wrong the limit.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K