Change of variables in a simple integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a change of variables in a simple integral involving kinetic energy and its relationship to variables such as velocity and position. The participants are examining the implications of these transformations on the integral's form and dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the power of the variable in the integral, specifically whether it should be 1/2 or 3/2. There are discussions about the dependence of variables and the implications of partial derivatives in the context of the integral.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the integral's formulation. Some have suggested checking the dimensional consistency as a means to verify the correctness of the expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific references, such as the SM of Reif, which may impose constraints on the interpretation of the problem. Additionally, the complexity of reconciling the mathematical expressions with physical dimensions is noted.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
Homework Statement
I have the integral ##\int_0^\infty dv v^2 x \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}##.
Using ##x=\beta(\frac{1}{2}mv^2-\mu)## we get:
##\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx x (x+\beta \mu)^{3/2}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}##.

The last integral upto some constants which don't get integrated.
Relevant Equations
they appear already in the HW statement.
So we have ##x=\beta(1/2 mv^2-\mu)##, i.e ##\sqrt{2(x/\beta+\mu)/m}=v##.
##dv= \sqrt{2/m}dx/\sqrt{2(x/\beta+\mu)/m}##.

So should I get in the second integral ##(x+\beta \mu)^{1/2}##, since we have: $$v^2 dv = (2(x/\beta+\mu)/m)\sqrt{2/m} dx/\sqrt{2(x/\beta+\mu)/m}$$

So shouldn't it be a power of 1/2 and not 3/2?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You show no explanation about ##\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}##.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
You show no explanation about ##\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}##.
Well, it's written that ##x## and ##g## both depend on ##v^2## only.
How does that fact change any thing here?
 
Ah, besides the fact that ##\partial g/\partial x = \partial g /\partial v \partial v / \partial x##, but I am not sure he changes it here that way...
 
I believe it should be 1/2 and not 3/2 because in the SM of Reif on equation (8) of page 108 he changes the LHS to 1/2 instead of 3/2.

Reading the SM alongside the problems and trying to understand the solutions can be quite time consuming, but hey that's what I chose to do. :-)
 
How about checking it by looking at dimension ? Apart from ##\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}## integral has dimension of ##L^4T^{-3}## if it is correct to take v and x velocity and coordinate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K