Change of variables when minimizing a function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is attempting to minimize the function \( f(a) = (1+4a^2)^3 \left( \frac{1}{4a^2} \right)^2 \) under the condition that \( a > 0 \). They have made a substitution \( \alpha = 4a^2 \) to simplify the derivative calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster discusses their substitution method and seeks justification for changing variables in optimization problems. Participants explore the implications of the chain rule in relation to the derivative of the function after substitution.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the chain rule and its application to the problem, indicating that the relationship between the derivatives of the original and substituted functions is being examined. There appears to be a productive exploration of whether the substitution affects the equivalence of critical points.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes considerations of the validity of variable substitution in the context of finding minima, as well as the implications of the chain rule on the derivatives involved.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement


I am trying to minimize the function ##f(a) = (1+4a^2)^3 \left( \frac{1}{4a^2} \right)^2##. Here we are given that ##a>0##

Homework Equations


Definition of a minimum of a function

The Attempt at a Solution


Now the derivative here will be ugly and equating it to zero and solving it will be messy. So I did a substitution, ##\alpha = 4a^2##. With this the function becomes ##f(\alpha) = \frac{(1+\alpha)^3}{\alpha^2}##. The derivative is easier to calculate $$f'(\alpha) = \frac{(1+\alpha)^2}{\alpha^2}\left[ 3 - \frac{2(1+\alpha)}{\alpha} \right] $$ Now since ##a>0##, we have ##\alpha >0## and when we equate ##f'(\alpha)## to zero, the equation just becomes $$\left[ 3 - \frac{2(1+\alpha)}{\alpha} \right] = 0$$ which is much easier to solve. ##\alpha = 2##. And using the relationship between ##a## and ##\alpha##, we can see that the function has a critical point when ##a = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}##. With either first derivative test or the second derivative test, we can confirm that this is where the function has a local minimum. Now is it ok to do change of variable like I have done here in maxima minima problems. How do I justify this ?

Thanks
##\ddot\smile##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have ##f(a)=g(\alpha)=g(\alpha(a))## and want to know, where ##f'(a)=\frac{d}{da}f(a)=\frac{d}{da}g(\alpha(a))=0##. What does the chain rule tell you?
 
Chain Rule tells us that ##\alpha'(a) g'(\alpha) = 0##
 
IssacNewton said:
Chain Rule tells us that ##\alpha'(a) g'(\alpha) = 0##
Yes. So the question is whether ##\alpha'(a)## can be zero or not. If not, then ##f'=0## and ##g'=0## are equivalent.
 
Here ##\alpha'(a) = 8a \ne 0## , which means that ##g'(\alpha) = 0## and we will solve for ##\alpha## and this will give us the critical value for ##f##. I think this is clear now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K