Changing the subject of a formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter chuckienz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
To make X the subject of the formula XA + BA = B, one must reverse the operations applied to X. First, subtract BA from both sides of the equation to isolate the term involving X. Next, divide both sides by A or multiply by A^-1 to solve for X. This process involves reversing the order of operations and ensuring that any changes made to one side of the equation are also applied to the other side. Following these steps will yield the desired expression for X.
chuckienz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, this most likely will be a silly question but I am having trouble trying to make X the subject of the formula XA +BA = B

im hoping someone is able to enlighten me

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
chuckienz said:
make X the subject

What do you mean by "subject"?
 
That British for what we Americans would call "solve the equation for x".

chuckienz, you solve an equation, or make x the subject of the equation, by "reversing" what has been done to x. Here, the equation is XA+ BA= B.

If I were given a value for A and asked to evaluate the left side, I would do two things: first multiply by A, second add BA. Here, you want to do the opposite. The opposite of "multiply by A" is "divide by A" or, same thing, "mutiply by A-1". The opposite of "add BA" is "subtract BA". Also, you because you are "reversing" everything you must also reverse the order. And, of course, anything you do to the left side of the equation, you must do to the right side.

So:
1) Subtract BA from both sides of the equation.
2) Multiply both sides of the equation by A-1.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top