Charge Density and Diract Delta Functions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving expressions for volume charge density using Dirac delta functions. For the first problem, the proposed solution is p(r) = [δ(r - Di)(-3q) + δ(r + Di)(q)], which correctly represents the charges at specified positions. In the second problem, the challenge lies in expressing the linear charge density in cylindrical coordinates, where the initial attempt resulted in incorrect units. A suggestion is made to use δ3(r) for point charges and δ2(r) for line charges to ensure proper dimensionality. Understanding the units of Dirac delta functions is crucial for accurate formulations in both Cartesian and cylindrical coordinates.
definerandom
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a) A charge q1 = q is at r'1 = -Di, and a charge q2 = -3q is at r'2 = Di. Find an expression for the volume charge density p(r).

b) An infinitely long wire along the z-axis has a uniform linear charge density \lambda. Find an expression for the volume charge density p(r) in cylindrical coordinates.

Homework Equations



\int\delta(x) dx = 1

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I'm not sure how to format my solution for the question, but I came up with this:
p(r) = [\delta(r - Di)(-3q) + \delta(r + Di)(q)]

b) I can't figure out how to do this with cylindrical coordinates. With Cartesian coordinates I came up with this:
p(x,y,z) = \delta(x)\delta(y)\lambda

When I try with cylindrical coordinates, I realize that r must equal zero, so I know \delta(r) would be part of the expression; however, \theta can be any value, as can z. That results in this:
p(r,\theta,z) = \delta(r)\lambda
which has incorrect units for volume charge density.

Any help on this question is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello definerandom,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

If you want to get the units correct, perhaps consider using δ3(r) = δ(x)δ(y)δ(z) = δ(r)δ()δ(rsinθΦ) for points, and δ2(r) = δ(x)δ(y) = δ(r)δ() for lines (where the z component is not included in r in the second case).

[Edit: Modified the cylindrical and polar representations. Anyway, the point being is that you can square or cube the Dirac delta function as appropriate, noting that each Dirac delta function has units of 1/length (such as 1/meters, for example.)

[Another edit: So in other words, when dealing with points, you should end up with δ3(), which has units of length-3. When working with lines, δ2() which has units of length-2.]
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
694
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K