Charge & Spin Ordering: Explained & Bond Lengths

  • Thread starter Thread starter marie2010
  • Start date Start date
marie2010
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
hi,
Can someone explain to me the difference between charge and spin ordering? How are they different and how are they related? I am very confused.
Also, how are the bond lengths affected if an element is in 4+ as opposed to 5+ (e.g. Te4+ or Te5+ bonded to 6 oxygens). Are they shorter/longer, unequal distribution.
Can someone please comment.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe an example is helpful: E. g. Holmium metal is a helicomagnet. Although the charge density at each Holmium atom is equal, the spin of the electrons at different sites points in different directions. Specifically, when moving along some axis in the crystal the spin rotates tracing out a helix in space. So while charge order is homogeneous, the spin order is quite complex.
To the second question: Typically, the higher the charge of the central atom, the shorter the bonds (due to the increased Coulomb interaction). Whether the bond length become unequal depends on details in the bonding and cannot be answered generally. A common cause for unequal bond length is a Jahn Teller distortion.
 
how to calculate ground state spins of odd-odd nucleus in the nilsson diagrams
 
Thank you for replying. Can you please help me understand the following:
How come Nb5+ is d0 and diamagnetic, but Nb4+ is d1. I cannot see it.
Thanks in advance.
 
Niob is in the fifth secondary group in the periodic system, i.e. it has 5 valence electrons (3 d- electrons and 2 s electrons). In Nb(V) you removed all of them leaving only filled shells, hence it is diamagnetic. In Nb(IV) one d-electron is left. Hence it is paramagnetic.
 
Thank you. I got it now.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top