Charges mass on the end of a light string

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a charged mass suspended from a light string, interacting with a uniformly charged vertical sheet. The objective is to determine the angle the string makes with the sheet and to find the surface charge density for a specified angle.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the angle, charge density, and forces acting on the mass. There is exploration of the equations relating these variables, particularly the role of electric field strength and gravitational force.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the correctness of their calculations and the relationships between the variables. Some have identified potential mistakes in their equations and are seeking clarification on how to properly calculate the electric field and charge density. There is a mix of attempts to resolve the problem and requests for further hints.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of the equations and the impact of changing charge density on the electric field. Participants are also referencing previous discussions for context.

MissPenguins
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charged mass on the end of a light string is
attached to a point on a uniformly charged
vertical sheet (with areal charge density
0.25 μC/m2) of infinite extent.

Look at attachment for diagram
Find the angle \theta the thread makes with the
vertically charged sheet. The acceleration of
gravity is 9.8 m/s2 and the permittivity of free
space is 8.854 × 10−12 C2/N · m2 .
Answer in units of degree.
I got the first part right to be 21.254189 using \theta=tan-1(qE/mg)
I need help with part 2
Find \sigma for an angle of 77o .
Answer in units of μC/m2.


Homework Equations


\theta=tan-1(qE/mg)
qE = \sigma/2Eo


The Attempt at a Solution


Since \theta=tan-1(qE/mg), so I did tan(77o) = (qE)(mg)
qE = 0.0038118 (calculated from part 1)
mg = 0.0098
\sigma=(qE)(mg) = 7.51677X10-13
Converted back to uC = 7.51677X10-7

What did I do wrong? Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • physicsforum.jpg
    physicsforum.jpg
    3.9 KB · Views: 696
Physics news on Phys.org
E will be different for part 2, since the charge density is different.

Also, did you mean (qE)/(mg) instead of (qE)(mg)?
 
Redbelly98 said:
E will be different for part 2, since the charge density is different.

Also, did you mean (qE)/(mg) instead of (qE)(mg)?

Yea. tan(77) = (qE/mg) which is qE=mgtan(77) = 0.04244
I am not sure what other charge density do I have to use. E0is a constant, that's given.
PLEASE HELP!

Same question as this one https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=109643
Except part 2 was not explained.
 
Okay, found another mistake:
MissPenguins said:
qE = \sigma/2Eo
Actually, it's E = \sigma/2eo (no q here).

Does that help?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Okay, found another mistake:

Actually, it's E = \sigma/2eo (no q here).

Does that help?

The previous one wasn't a mistake.
It's qE = mgtan(77) = 0.042448
I already did this \sigma = (E)(2Eo).
So (0.042448)(2(8.85X10-12) = 7.5133X10-13. I converted back to uC = 7.51633X10-7. And it is wrong! :(
 
MissPenguins said:
The previous one wasn't a mistake.
It's qE = mgtan(77) = 0.042448
I agree, qE = 0.042448 N.

So based on that, what is E equal to?

I already did this \sigma = (E)(2Eo).
So (0.042448)(2(8.85X10-12) = 7.5133X10-13.
Okay. But E is not 0.042448 -- see my comment above.
 
Redbelly98 said:
I agree, qE = 0.042448 N.

So based on that, what is E equal to?


Okay. But E is not 0.042448 -- see my comment above.

You said E is different for part 2 since the charge density changed. So how do I find E? I attempted to do (0.25E-6)/(2*8.854E-12) = 14117.91281 for E, is this right for E?
Then use (14117.91281)(2*8.854E-12) = 2.5E-7?
It doesn't make sense. Can you give me more hints? Thanks.
 
You've already written an equation of the form

tan(θ) = (q*E)/(m*g)

Can you not rearrange to find E? With E can you find σ ?
 
I figured the problem out. Thank you very much everyone!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K